Feasibility of contrast-enhanced mammography in women with breast implants Journal Article


Authors: Hogan, M. P.; Amir, T.; Mango, V. L.; Morris, E. A.; Jochelson, M. S.
Article Title: Feasibility of contrast-enhanced mammography in women with breast implants
Abstract: Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) may provide an alternative to magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic exam in women with known or suspected breast cancer or as a screening exam in women at increased risk of breast cancer. Women with breast augmentation, either for oncologic or cosmetic reasons, may fall into this increased risk population and need safe and effective screening and diagnostic imaging tools. Here, we present our clinical practice data in order to demonstrate the feasibility of CEM in women with breast implants. An institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant, retrospective review of our tertiary cancer center's database yielded 104 women with breast implants who underwent 198 CEM exams from November 2014 to March 2020. All 198/198 (100%) exams were successfully completed in 104 women. Exam indications included: 174/198 (88%) screening due to increased risk, 10/198 (5%) to evaluate a palpable abnormality, 9/198 (<5%) to evaluate disease extent following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for a known breast malignancy, and 5/198 (<3%) for a 6-month follow-up. 97/104 (93%) women had dense breasts. Routine and implant-displaced low-energy views were obtained with contrast-enhanced images obtained on displaced views for all patients. 197/198 (99.5%) exams yielded no complications. In one exam, the patient experienced mild vasovagal symptoms following the administration of contrast. In conclusion, it is feasible to utilize CEM in both diagnostic and screening capacities in women with breast implants. © 2022
Keywords: chemotherapy; magnetic resonance imaging; breast cancer; diagnostic imaging; health insurance; image enhancement; medical imaging; screening; breast implants; diseases; imaging tools; risk screening; clinical practices; institutional review boards; high-risk screening; contrast-enhanced mammography; contrast-enhanced mammographies; breast augmentations
Journal Title: Clinical Imaging
Volume: 93
ISSN: 0899-7071
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2023-01-01
Start Page: 31
End Page: 33
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.10.012
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 36371851
PMCID: PMC10445338
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- The NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748 is acknowledged in the PDF -- Corresponding author is MSK author Molly P. Hogan -- Export Date: 1 December 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Elizabeth A Morris
    336 Morris
  2. Maxine Jochelson
    134 Jochelson
  3. Victoria Lee Mango
    62 Mango
  4. Molly Parsons Hogan
    9 Hogan
  5. Tali Amir
    13 Amir