Liver drains after surgery: What is the real practice? An international snapshot from the Li.DR.A.S. survey Journal Article


Authors: Famularo, S.; Berardi, G.; Pawlik, T. M.; Donadon, M.; Torzilli, G.
Article Title: Liver drains after surgery: What is the real practice? An international snapshot from the Li.DR.A.S. survey
Abstract: Despite current evidence, the use of drains in liver surgery is still controversial. We conducted an international survey to investigate the clinical use of drains in the E-AHPBA, A-HPBA and A-PHPBA communities. An open survey of 30 questions was prepared on Google-Form and distributed by email to all members. One hundred and ninety-one HPB surgeons responded to the survey. One hundred and twelve surgeons (58.6%) reported routine use of abdominal drains after liver resections. Eighty-eight (46.1%) responded that removal was driven by low volume and low bilirubin levels in the drains. For minor liver resection, 97 (50.8%) surgeons reported using drains selectively; in contrast, 134 (70.2%) surgeons prefer to use a drain always after major procedures. Among patients with cirrhosis, 87 (45.5%) surgeons reported routine drains placement, while 84 (44.0%) considered drains selectively. A no-drain policy was most prevalent among surgeons from North America (80%) versus Asian-Pacific (70.0%), European and African (60.8%), and South American (61.5%) surgeons. Among minimally invasive surgeons, 74.2% reported drain use only in selected cases versus 35.0% among surgeons who performed open surgery. The practice of draining after liver surgery is still highly variable among centers and surgeons around the world, with a high variability according to the underlying liver condition and planned surgical approach. © 2022, Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).
Keywords: questionnaire; liver; abdomen; liver surgery; hepatectomy; drainage; survey; procedures; humans; human; surveys and questionnaires; liver drains; no drain policy
Journal Title: Updates in Surgery
Volume: 74
Issue: 4
ISSN: 2038-131X
Publisher: Springer - Verlag Italia  
Date Published: 2022-08-01
Start Page: 1317
End Page: 1326
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01301-w
PUBMED: 35657558
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 September 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors