Evaluating frailty, mortality, and complications associated with metastatic spine tumor surgery using machine learning–derived body composition analysis Journal Article


Authors: Massaad, E.; Bridge, C. P.; Kiapour, A.; Fourman, M. S.; Duvall, J. B.; Connolly, I. D.; Hadzipasic, M.; Shankar, G. M.; Andriole, K. P.; Rosenthal, M.; Schoenfeld, A. J.; Bilsky, M. H.; Shin, J. H.
Article Title: Evaluating frailty, mortality, and complications associated with metastatic spine tumor surgery using machine learning–derived body composition analysis
Abstract: OBJECTIVE Cancer patients with spinal metastases may undergo surgery without clear assessments of prognosis, thereby impacting the optimal palliative strategy. Because the morbidity of surgery may adversely impact recovery and initiation of adjuvant therapies, evaluation of risk factors associated with mortality risk and complications is critical. Evaluation of body composition of cancer patients as a surrogate for frailty is an emerging area of study for improving preoperative risk stratification. METHODS To examine the associations of muscle characteristics and adiposity with postoperative complications, length of stay, and mortality in patients with spinal metastases, the authors designed an observational study of 484 cancer patients who received surgical treatment for spinal metastases between 2010 and 2019. Sarcopenia, muscle radiodensity, visceral adiposity, and subcutaneous adiposity were assessed on routinely available 3-month preoperative CT images by using a validated deep learning methodology. The authors used k-means clustering analysis to identify patients with similar body composition characteristics. Regression models were used to examine the associations of sarcopenia, frailty, and clusters with the outcomes of interest. RESULTS Of 484 patients enrolled, 303 had evaluable CT data on muscle and adiposity (mean age 62.00 ± 11.91 years; 57.8% male). The authors identified 2 clusters with significantly different body composition characteristics and mortality risks after spine metastases surgery. Patients in cluster 2 (high-risk cluster) had lower muscle mass index (mean ± SD 41.16 ± 7.99 vs 50.13 ± 10.45 cm2/m2), lower subcutaneous fat area (147.62 ± 57.80 vs 289.83 ± 109.31 cm2), lower visceral fat area (82.28 ± 48.96 vs 239.26 ± 98.40 cm2), higher muscle radiodensity (35.67 ± 9.94 vs 31.13 ± 9.07 Hounsfield units [HU]), and significantly higher risk of 1-year mortality (adjusted HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.05–2.01, p = 0.02) than individuals in cluster 1 (low-risk cluster). Decreased muscle mass, muscle radiodensity, and adiposity were not associated with a higher rate of complications after surgery. Prolonged length of stay (> 7 days) was associated with low muscle radiodensity (mean 30.87 vs 35.23 HU, 95% CI 1.98–6.73, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Body composition analysis shows promise for better risk stratification of patients with spinal metastases under consideration for surgery. Those with lower muscle mass and subcutaneous and visceral adiposity are at greater risk for inferior outcomes. © 2022 The authors.
Keywords: adult; aged; survival analysis; cancer surgery; survival rate; major clinical study; overall survival; conference paper; cancer patient; preoperative evaluation; disease association; computer assisted tomography; obesity; oncology; retrospective study; risk factor; high risk patient; age; risk assessment; postoperative complication; length of stay; body composition; observational study; gender; spine metastasis; skeletal muscle; spine surgery; clinical outcome; intra-abdominal fat; spine fusion; subcutaneous fat; metastasis resection; in-hospital mortality; mortality rate; machine learning; frailty; cancer prognosis; muscle mass; human; male; female; sarcopenia; deep learning; mortality risk; predictive analytics; k means clustering; muscle characteristics and functions
Journal Title: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Volume: 37
Issue: 2
ISSN: 1547-5654
Publisher: American Association of Neurological Surgeons  
Date Published: 2022-08-01
Start Page: 263
End Page: 273
Language: English
DOI: 10.3171/2022.1.Spine211284
PUBMED: 35213829
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 1 September 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Mark H Bilsky
    319 Bilsky