Final overall survival and molecular analysis in IMmotion151, a phase 3 trial comparing atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs sunitinib in patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma Journal Article


Authors: Motzer, R. J.; Powles, T.; Atkins, M. B.; Escudier, B.; McDermott, D. F.; Alekseev, B. Y.; Lee, J. L.; Suarez, C.; Stroyakovskiy, D.; De Giorgi, U.; Donskov, F.; Mellado, B.; Banchereau, R.; Hamidi, H.; Khan, O.; Craine, V.; Huseni, M.; Flinn, N.; Dubey, S.; Rini, B. I.
Article Title: Final overall survival and molecular analysis in IMmotion151, a phase 3 trial comparing atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs sunitinib in patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Abstract: Key Points: Question: Does combined programmed death ligand 1 and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition with atezolizumab and bevacizumab improve overall survival (OS) with an acceptable safety profile vs sunitinib for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma? Findings: This phase 3 randomized clinical trial of 915 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma found similar OS with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs sunitinib, with an acceptable safety profile. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab demonstrated improved OS when patients with tumors characterized by T-effector/proliferative, proliferative, and small nucleolar RNA transcription profiles were combined. Meaning: While OS showed no difference between randomized treatment groups, exploratory subanalysis findings suggest that biomarker analyses may identify patients likely to benefit from combined anti−programmed death ligand 1 and anti–vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Importance: Interim analyses of the IMmotion151 trial (A Study of Atezolizumab in Combination With Bevacizumab Versus Sunitinib in Participants With Untreated Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma) reported improved progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with programmed death ligand 1–positive (PD-L1+) metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) receiving the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab plus the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor bevacizumab vs the receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib. Overall survival (OS) results were immature at interim analyses. Objective: To report the final OS results, safety, and exploratory biomarker analyses of the association of transcriptomic subgroups with OS in the IMmotion151 trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: IMmotion151 was a multicenter, open-label, phase 3 randomized clinical trial that compared the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs sunitinib in patients with untreated mRCC. IMmotion151 included patients from 152 academic medical centers and community oncology practices in 21 countries. Adult patients with mRCC with components of clear cell or sarcomatoid histologic features, measurable disease (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1), adequate performance status, hematologic and end organ function, and tumor tissue available for PD-L1 testing were included. IMmotion151 was initiated on May 20, 2015, and the study is ongoing. This final analysis was performed from May 20, 2015, to February 14, 2020. Interventions: Receipt of 1200 mg of intravenous (IV) atezolizumab every 3 weeks and 15 mg/kg of IV bevacizumab every 3 weeks or 50 mg orally once daily of sunitinib (4 weeks on and 2 weeks off). Main Outcomes and Measures: The coprimary end points were PFS (previously reported) in patients with PD-L1+ disease and OS in the intention-to-treat population. Additional exploratory outcomes included OS in the PD-L1+ population, association with transcriptomic subgroups, and safety. Results: The IMmotion151 trial assessed 915 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Mean (IQR) age was 62 (56-69) years for patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and 60 (54-66) years for patients receiving sunitinib; 669 (73.1%) were male and 246 (26.9%) were female. The final analysis showed similar median OS in patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs sunitinib in the intention-to-treat (36.1 vs 35.3 months) and PD-L1+ (38.7 vs 31.6 months) populations. No new safety signals were reported. The additional exploratory outcome of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs sunitinib showed improved median OS trends in patients whose tumors were characterized by T-effector/proliferative, proliferative, or small nucleolar RNA transcriptomic profiles (35.4 vs 21.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.98). Conclusions and Relevance: The primary end point of PFS was met at interim analyses, although no improvement in OS was observed with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab at the final analysis. Biomarker analyses provided insight into which patients with mRCC may benefit from c mbined anti−PD-L1 and anti-VEGF therapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02420821 This phase 3 randomized clinical trial reports the final overall survival, safety, and exploratory analyses of the association of transcriptomic subsets with overall survival from IMmotion151.
Keywords: aged; sequence analysis; gene expression profiling; randomized controlled trials; progression-free survival; descriptive statistics; funding source; middle age; antineoplastic agents, combined -- therapeutic use; antineoplastic agents, combined -- adverse effects; cancer patients; multicenter studies; random assignment; tumor markers, biological -- analysis; human; male; female; bevacizumab -- therapeutic use; renal cell carcinoma, metastatic -- drug therapy; sunitinib -- therapeutic use; immune checkpoint inhibitors -- therapeutic use; renal cell carcinoma, metastatic -- prognosis; drug efficacy -- evaluation; sunitinib -- adverse effects
Journal Title: JAMA Oncology
Volume: 8
Issue: 2
ISSN: 2374-2437
Publisher: American Medical Association  
Date Published: 2022-02-01
Start Page: 275
End Page: 280
Language: English
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.5981
PROVIDER: EBSCOhost
PROVIDER: cinahl
PMCID: PMC8855230
PUBMED: 34940781
DOI/URL:
Notes: Accession Number: 155309583 -- Entry Date: 20220222 -- Revision Date: 20220222 -- Publication Type: Article; research; tables/charts; randomized controlled trial -- Journal Subset: Peer Reviewed; USA -- Grant Information: This work was supported by F -- Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd -- and Genentech, Inc.. -- Source: Cinahl
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Robert Motzer
    1247 Motzer