Efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab following disease progression on atezolizumab or sunitinib monotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in IMmotion150: A randomized phase 2 clinical trial Journal Article


Authors: Powles, T.; Atkins, M. B.; Escudier, B.; Motzer, R. J.; Rini, B. I.; Fong, L.; Joseph, R. W.; Pal, S. K.; Sznol, M.; Hainsworth, J.; Stadler, W. M.; Hutson, T. E.; Ravaud, A.; Bracarda, S.; Suarez, C.; Choueiri, T. K.; Reeves, J.; Cohn, A.; Ding, B.; Leng, N.; Hashimoto, K.; Huseni, M.; Schiff, C.; McDermott, D. F.
Article Title: Efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab following disease progression on atezolizumab or sunitinib monotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in IMmotion150: A randomized phase 2 clinical trial
Abstract: Background: The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy as second-line treatment for metastatic clear cell renal cancer (mRCC) has not been evaluated prospectively. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab + bevacizumab following disease progression on atezolizumab or sunitinib monotherapy in patients with mRCC. Design, setting, and participants: IMmotion150 was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 study of patients with untreated mRCC. Patients randomized to the atezolizumab or sunitinib arm who had investigator-assessed progression as per RECIST 1.1 could be treated with second-line atezolizumab + bevacizumab. Intervention: Patients received atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously (IV) plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV every 3 wk following disease progression on either atezolizumab or sunitinib monotherapy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The secondary endpoints analyzed during the second-line part of IMmotion150 included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. PFS was examined using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results and limitations: Fifty-nine patients in the atezolizumab arm and 78 in the sunitinib arm were eligible, and 103 initiated second-line atezolizumab + bevacizumab (atezolizumab arm, n = 44; sunitinib arm, n = 59). ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 27% (19–37%). The median PFS (95% CI) from the start of second line was 8.7 (5.6–13.7) mo. The median event follow-up duration was 19.4 (12.9–21.9) mo among the 25 patients without a PFS event. Eighty-six (83%) patients had treatment-related adverse events; 31 of 103 (30%) had grade 3/4 events. Limitations were the small sample size and selection for progressors. Conclusions: The atezolizumab + bevacizumab combination had activity and was tolerable in patients with progression on atezolizumab or sunitinib. Further studies are needed to investigate sequencing strategies in mRCC. Patient summary: Patients with advanced kidney cancer whose disease had worsened during treatment with atezolizumab or sunitinib began second-line treatment with atezolizumab + bevacizumab. Tumors shrank in more than one-quarter of patients treated with this combination, and side effects were manageable. © 2021
Keywords: adult; cancer survival; controlled study; aged; major clinical study; fatigue; bevacizumab; sunitinib; cancer combination chemotherapy; diarrhea; drug efficacy; drug safety; drug withdrawal; hypertension; monotherapy; treatment duration; cancer patient; follow up; prospective study; biological marker; cancer immunotherapy; progression free survival; phase 2 clinical trial; nausea; randomized controlled trial; renal cell carcinoma; arthralgia; multicenter study; open study; hypothyroidism; epistaxis; kidney metastasis; proteinuria; metastatic; vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor; response evaluation criteria in solid tumors; second line; human; male; female; priority journal; article; evaluation study; atezolizumab; treatment response time
Journal Title: European Urology
Volume: 79
Issue: 5
ISSN: 0302-2838
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2021-05-01
Start Page: 665
End Page: 673
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.003
PUBMED: 33678522
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC9357270
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 3 May 2021 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Robert Motzer
    1243 Motzer