Orbital metastases: A systematic review of clinical characteristics, management strategies, and treatment outcomes Review


Authors: Palmisciano, P.; Ferini, G.; Ogasawara, C.; Wahood, W.; Alamer, O. B.; Gupta, A. D.; Scalia, G.; Larsen, A. M. G.; Yu, K.; Umana, G. E.; Cohen-Gadol, A. A.; El Ahmadieh, T. Y.; Haider, A. S.
Review Title: Orbital metastases: A systematic review of clinical characteristics, management strategies, and treatment outcomes
Abstract: Background: Orbital metastases often lead to severe functional impairment. The role of resection, orbital exenteration, and complementary treatments is still debated. We systemati-cally reviewed the literature on orbital metastases. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web-of-Science, and Cochrane were searched upon PRISMA guidelines to identify studies on orbital metastases. Clinical characteristics, management strategies, and survival were analyzed. Results: We included 262 studies comprising 873 patients. Median age was 59 years. The most frequent primary tumors were breast (36.3%), melanoma (10.1%), and prostate (8.5%) cancers, with median time interval of 12 months (range, 0–420). The most common symptoms were proptosis (52.3%) and relative-afferent-pupillary-defect (38.7%). Most metastases showed a diffuse location within the orbit (19%), with preferential infiltration of orbital soft tissues (40.2%). In 47 cases (5.4%), tumors extended intracra-nially. Incisional biopsy (63.7%) was preferred over fine-needle aspiration (10.2%), with partial resection (16.6%) preferred over complete (9.5%). Orbital exenteration was pursued in 26 patients (3%). A total of 305 patients (39.4%) received chemotherapy, and 506 (58%) received orbital radio-therapy. Post-treatment symptom improvement was significantly superior after resection (p = 0.005) and orbital radiotherapy (p = 0.032). Mean follow-up was 14.3 months, and median overall survival was 6 months. Fifteen cases (1.7%) demonstrated recurrence with median local control of six months. Overall survival was statistically increased in patients with breast cancer (p < 0.001) and in patients undergoing resection (p = 0.024) but was not correlated with orbital location (p = 0.174), intracranial extension (p = 0.073), biopsy approach (p = 0.344), extent-of-resection (p = 0.429), or orbital exenteration (p = 0.153). Conclusions: Orbital metastases severely impair patient quality of life. Surgical resection safely provides symptom and survival benefit compared to biopsy, while orbital radiotherapy significantly improves symptoms compared to not receiving radiotherapy. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Keywords: radiation oncology; systematic review; orbital metastases; orbital exenteration; skull base oncology
Journal Title: Cancers
Volume: 14
Issue: 1
ISSN: 2072-6694
Publisher: MDPI  
Date Published: 2022-01-01
Start Page: 94
Language: English
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010094
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC8750198
PUBMED: 35008259
DOI/URL:
Notes: Review -- Export Date: 1 February 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Kenny Kwok Hei Yu
    32 Yu