Diagnostic conization of the cervix: Review of 460 consecutive cases Journal Article


Authors: Killackey, M. A.; Jones, W. B.; Lewis, J. L. Jr
Article Title: Diagnostic conization of the cervix: Review of 460 consecutive cases
Abstract: During a five-year period, 460 patients underwent cervical conization on the Gynecology Service at Memorial Hospital. The pertinent medical history of the 393 patients was reviewed as it related to the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. All patients had repeat Papanicolaou smears and 94.4% had complete colposcopic examination using standard colposcopic procedures, endocervical curettage, and directed biopsies. For the purpose of this review, patients were separated into seven groups according to the primary and most significant indication for conization. The indications for the procedure and the histopathologic findings are discussed for each category. The usefulness of conization in the authors' institution varied according to the indication for which it was carried out. In this series of 393 patients, 18 patients (4.7%) initially diagnosed to have only intraepithelial disease, were found to have invasive carcinoma. (C) 1986 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. © 1986 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Keywords: adolescent; adult; clinical article; aged; carcinoma, squamous cell; comparative study; adenocarcinoma; age factors; biopsy; carcinoma in situ; diagnosis; carcinoma; invasive carcinoma; therapy; cytodiagnosis; colposcopy; cervix uteri; vaginal smears; female genital system; survey; prevention; middle age; uterine cervix conization; papanicolaou test; cervix neoplasms; human; female; priority journal
Journal Title: Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume: 67
Issue: 6
ISSN: 0029-7844
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 1986-06-01
Start Page: 766
End Page: 770
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/00006250-198606000-00004
PUBMED: 3703403
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 18 August 2021 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Walter   Jones
    95 Jones
  2. John   Lewis
    132 Lewis