Safety and efficacy of virtual prostatectomy with single-dose radiotherapy in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Results from the PROSINT phase 2 randomized clinical trial Journal Article


Authors: Greco, C.; Pares, O.; Pimentel, N.; Louro, V.; Santiago, I.; Vieira, S.; Stroom, J.; Mateus, D.; Soares, A.; Marques, J.; Freitas, E.; Coelho, G.; Seixas, M.; Lopez-Beltran, A.; Fuks, Z.
Article Title: Safety and efficacy of virtual prostatectomy with single-dose radiotherapy in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Results from the PROSINT phase 2 randomized clinical trial
Abstract: IMPORTANCE Ultra-high single-dose radiotherapy (SDRT) represents a potential alternative to curative extreme hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in organ-confined prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE To compare toxic effect profiles, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses, and quality-of-life end points of SDRT vs extreme hypofractionated SBRT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The PROSINT single-institution phase 2 randomized clinical trial accrued, between September 2015 and January 2017, 30 participants with intermediate-risk prostate cancer to receive SDRT or extreme hypofractionated SBRT. Androgen deprivation therapy was not permitted. Data were analyzed from March to May 2020. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 5 × 9 Gy SBRT (control arm) or 24 Gy SDRT (test arm). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was toxic effects; the secondary end points were PSA response, PSA relapse-free survival, and patient-reported quality of life measured with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 questionnaires. RESULTS A total of 30 men were randomized; median (interquartile range) age was 66.3 (61.2-69.9) and 73.6 (64.7-75.9) years for the SBRT and SDRT arms, respectively. Time to appearance and duration of acute and late toxic effects were similar in the 2 trial arms. Cumulative late actuarial urinary toxic effects did not differ for grade 1 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 90% CI, 0.13-1.27) and grade 2 or greater (HR, 1.07; 90% CI, 0.21-5.57). Actuarial grade 1 late gastrointestinal (GI) toxic effects were comparable (HR, 0.37; 90% CI, 0.07-1.94) and there were no grade 2 or greater late GI toxic effects. Declines in PSA level to less than 0.5 ng/mL occurred by 36 months in both study arms. No PSA relapses occurred in favorable intermediate-risk disease, while in the unfavorable category, the actuarial 4-year PSA relapse-free survival values were 75.0% vs 64.0% (HR, 0.76; 90% CI, 0.17-3.31) for SBRT vs SDRT, respectively. The EPIC-26 median summary scores for the genitourinary and GI domains dropped transiently at 1 month and returned to pretreatment scores by 3 months in both arms. The IPSS-derived transient late urinary flare symptoms occurred at 9 to 18 months in 20% (90% CI, 3%-37%) of patients receiving SDRT. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial among patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer, SDRT was safe and associated with low toxicity, and the tumor control and quality-of-life end points closely match the SBRT arm outcomes. Further studies are encouraged to explore indications for SDRT in the cure of prostate cancer. © 2021 American Medical Association.
Keywords: adult; clinical article; controlled study; treatment outcome; aged; prostate specific antigen; quality of life; phase 2 clinical trial; randomized controlled trial; radiation injury; prostate cancer; prostatectomy; cancer control; stereotactic body radiation therapy; gastrointestinal disease; disease exacerbation; recurrence free survival; intermediate risk patient; urinary tract disease; international prostate symptom score; human; male; article; genital system disease assessment; expanded prostate cancer index composite 26; single dose radiotherapy
Journal Title: JAMA Oncology
Volume: 7
Issue: 5
ISSN: 2374-2437
Publisher: American Medical Association  
Date Published: 2021-05-01
Start Page: 700
End Page: 708
Language: English
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0039
PUBMED: 33704378
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC7953338
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 July 2021 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Zvi Fuks
    427 Fuks