Medical oncologists' views on communicating with patients about chemotherapy costs: A pilot survey Journal Article


Authors: Schrag, D.; Hanger, M.
Article Title: Medical oncologists' views on communicating with patients about chemotherapy costs: A pilot survey
Abstract: Purpose: As chemotherapy costs escalate, financial concerns have become relevant for more cancer patients. Yet, little is known about how oncologists communicate with patients about coping with chemotherapy treatment costs. Methods: To understand how medical oncologists view these issues, we developed a survey eliciting their attitudes and behaviors surrounding discussing costs of therapy in the context of treatment decision making. The survey was piloted at a national meeting and then mailed to a random sample of actively practicing 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology members in the 50 United States. Survey items used a 5-point Likert scale designed to elicit oncologists' practices and attitudes regarding discussion of chemotherapy costs with patients. The first survey wave also included two clinical vignettes about hypothetical patients contemplating treatment with high-cost regimens. Results: Of 530 mailed surveys, 167 were returned for an overall response rate of 31.5%. Most oncologists reported knowledge of their patients' financial well-being: 15% all of the time, 39% most of the time, 33% some of the time, and 13% rarely/none of the time. There was substantial variation in oncologists' attitudes toward discussing chemotherapy costs with patients: 42% did so always or most of the time, 32% sometimes did, and 26% rarely or never did. Most oncologists (80%) felt that it was important to be explicit about the impact of treatment choices on patients' finances. However, 20% maintained that costs play no role in clinical encounters, and 31% reported a high degree of discomfort in discussing costs with patients. Referral to support staff for these discussions was common. Only a few oncologists (16%) acknowledged omitting treatment options on the basis of their perceptions of patients' ability to afford treatment. Conclusion: There is important heterogeneity in medical oncologists' attitudes toward discussing chemotherapy treatment costs with patients. Mismatch between physician and patient viewpoints has the potential to result in miscommunication and suboptimally informed treatment decisions. © 2007 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Keywords: cancer chemotherapy; review; treatment planning; antineoplastic agents; united states; antineoplastic agent; neoplasm; neoplasms; health survey; oncology; drug cost; financial management; health care cost; economics; drug costs; psychological aspect; doctor patient relation; pilot study; pilot projects; communication; physician-patient relations; medical oncology; medical practice; physician; attitude of health personnel; behavior; interpersonal communication; physician attitude; decision making; health personnel attitude; wellbeing; medical staff; random sample; vignette
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume: 25
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0732-183X
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2007-01-10
Start Page: 233
End Page: 237
Language: English
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.09.2437
PUBMED: 17210946
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 26" - "Export Date: 17 November 2011" - "CODEN: JCOND" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Deborah Schrag
    229 Schrag
  2. Alison Morgan Hanger
    3 Hanger