Psychological well-being of palliative care professionals: Who cares? Review


Authors: Moreno-Milan, B.; Breitbart, B.; Herreros, B.; Olaciregui Dague, K.; Coca Pereira, M. C.
Review Title: Psychological well-being of palliative care professionals: Who cares?
Abstract: Abstract Background Traditionally, the psychological well-being of healthcare workers has been taken for granted - it has even been considered a part of the requirements that were demanded of them. When these professionals have experienced suffering and psychological depletion, they have been held accountable for this suffering, adopting an individualistic and reductionist viewpoint focused only on the professional. This approach has become obsolete due to its proven ineffectiveness, especially from an ethics of responsibility and organization viewpoint. Context The psychological well-being of the healthcare worker (and its opposites: suffering, exhaustion, and disenchantment) is advantageous to the professional's commitment to the institution, to their work performance, and to their personal life. Objective The objective of this paper is to reflect on the psychological suffering of the palliative care professional. Method We will reflect on the three levels of responsibility that influence such suffering (micro-meso-macro-ethical; worker-environment-institution). Results We will propose a global strategy for the care of psychological well-being supported by scientific evidence and key references. Significance of results We conclude with some contributions on what we have learned and still have to learn on this topic. Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Keywords: palliative medicine; responsibility; suffering; psychological well-being; professional
Journal Title: Palliative and Supportive Care
Volume: 19
Issue: 2
ISSN: 1478-9515
Publisher: Cambridge University Press  
Date Published: 2021-04-01
Start Page: 257
End Page: 261
Language: English
DOI: 10.1017/s1478951521000134
PUBMED: 33818368
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC8314064
DOI/URL:
Notes: Review -- Export Date: 1 June 2021 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. William S Breitbart
    505 Breitbart