The predictive value of ductography and magnetic resonance imaging in the management of nipple discharge Journal Article


Authors: Morrogh, M.; Morris, E. A.; Liberman, L.; Borgen, P. I.; King, T. A.
Article Title: The predictive value of ductography and magnetic resonance imaging in the management of nipple discharge
Abstract: Background: Standard evaluation (physical examination, mammography, sonography) often fails to identify an underlying lesion in patients with suspicious nipple discharge. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of ductography (DG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in this setting. Methods: Using ICD-9 codes, we retrospectively identified 376 patients who presented with suspicious nipple discharge (ND) (1995-2005); 306 patients (68%) had negative standard evaluation. Results: Among 306 patients, 186 (61%) underwent further evaluation with DG (n = 163) and/or MRI (n = 52), 35 (11%) underwent major duct excision alone (MDE), and 85 (28%) were followed clinically. Ultimately, 182/306 (59%) patients underwent surgery and/or biopsy. Overall incidence of malignant or high-risk pathology was 15% (46/306). DG was completed in 139/163 (85%) studies and detected 12 cancers and seven high-risk lesions (HRL), but failed to identify four cancers and 2 HRL (PPV 19%, NPV 63%). MRI detected seven cancers and three HRL, but failed to identify one cancer and one HRL (PPV 56%, NPV 87%). MDE alone (n = 35) detected five cancers and three HRL. Of all patients not having surgery, (142/306, 41%), one (0.01%) presented with an invasive cancer at 102 months (median follow-up, 6.3 months; range, 0-124 months). Conclusions: An underlying malignancy was identified in 30/306 (10%) patients with ND and negative standard evaluation. Ductography is a poor predictor of underlying pathology and cannot exclude malignancy. MRI's higher predictive values may allow for improved patient selection and treatment planning; however, MRI should not replace MDE as the gold standard to exclude malignancy in patients with ND and negative standard evaluation. © 2007 Society of Surgical Oncology.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; human tissue; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; retrospective studies; major clinical study; cancer risk; patient selection; treatment planning; nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; follow up; magnetic resonance imaging; cancer diagnosis; gold standard; diagnosis, differential; risk factors; pathology; breast neoplasms; retrospective study; cancer invasion; mammography; predictive value of tests; predictor variable; nipples; breast surgery; mri; predictive value; breast biopsy; breast diseases; nipple discharge; breast discharge; exudates and transudates; galactography; ductography
Journal Title: Annals of Surgical Oncology
Volume: 14
Issue: 12
ISSN: 1068-9265
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2007-12-01
Start Page: 3369
End Page: 3377
Language: English
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9530-5
PUBMED: 17896158
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 18" - "Export Date: 17 November 2011" - "CODEN: ASONF" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Laura Liberman
    176 Liberman
  2. Elizabeth A Morris
    336 Morris
  3. Tari King
    186 King
  4. Patrick I Borgen
    253 Borgen
  5. Mary Morrogh
    33 Morrogh