The optimal cut-off values for tumor size, number of lesions, and CEA levels in patients with surgically treated colorectal cancer liver metastases: An international, multi-institutional study Journal Article


Authors: Kamphues, C.; Andreatos, N.; Kruppa, J.; Buettner, S.; Wang, J.; Sasaki, K.; Wagner, D.; Morioka, D.; Fitschek, F.; Løes, I. M.; Imai, K.; Sun, J.; Poultsides, G.; Kaczirek, K.; Lønning, P. E.; Endo, I.; Baba, H.; Kornprat, P.; Aucejo, F. N.; Wolfgang, C. L.; Kreis, M. E.; Weiss, M. J.; Margonis, G. A.
Article Title: The optimal cut-off values for tumor size, number of lesions, and CEA levels in patients with surgically treated colorectal cancer liver metastases: An international, multi-institutional study
Abstract: Background and Objectives: Despite the long-standing consensus on the importance of tumor size, tumor number and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels as predictors of long-term outcomes among patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), optimal prognostic cut-offs for these variables have not been established. Methods: Patients who underwent curative-intent resection of CRLM and had available data on at least one of the three variables of interest above were selected from a multi-institutional dataset of patients with known KRAS mutational status. The resulting cohort was randomly split into training and testing datasets and recursive partitioning analysis was employed to determine optimal cut-offs. The concordance probability estimates (CPEs) for these optimal cut offs were calculated and compared to CPEs for the most widely used cut-offs in the surgical literature. Results: A total of 1643 patients who met eligibility criteria were identified. Following recursive partitioning analysis in the training dataset, the following cut-offs were identified: 2.95 cm for tumor size, 1.5 for tumor number and 6.15 ng/ml for CEA levels. In the entire dataset, the calculated CPEs for the new tumor size (0.52), tumor number (0.56) and CEA (0.53) cut offs exceeded CPEs for other commonly employed cut-offs. Conclusion: The current study was able to identify optimal cut-offs for the three most commonly employed prognostic factors in CRLM. While the per variable gains in discriminatory power are modest, these novel cut-offs may help produce appreciable increases in prognostic performance when combined in the context of future risk scores. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Surgical Oncology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC
Keywords: adolescent; adult; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; survival rate; retrospective studies; young adult; clinical trial; liver neoplasms; follow up; follow-up studies; colorectal cancer; metabolism; carcinoembryonic antigen; pathology; retrospective study; tumor marker; colorectal neoplasms; multicenter study; colorectal tumor; liver tumor; prognostic factors; liver resection; hepatectomy; metastases; international agencies; international cooperation; procedures; very elderly; humans; prognosis; human; male; female; biomarkers, tumor
Journal Title: Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume: 123
Issue: 4
ISSN: 0022-4790
Publisher: Wiley Blackwell  
Date Published: 2021-03-15
Start Page: 939
End Page: 948
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/jso.26361
PUBMED: 33400818
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 April 2021 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors