Sentinel lymph node biopsy for T1b melanoma: Balancing prognostic value and cost Journal Article


Authors: Hu, Y.; Briggs, A.; Gennarelli, R. L.; Bartlett, E. K.; Ariyan, C. E.; Coit, D. G.; Brady, M. S.
Article Title: Sentinel lymph node biopsy for T1b melanoma: Balancing prognostic value and cost
Abstract: Background: The purpose of this study is to report the additional prognostic information and cost associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for patients with T1b melanoma. Patients and Methods: An institutional database was queried for patients with T1b melanoma (0.8–1.0 mm or < 0.8 mm with ulceration) with at least 5 years of follow-up. Results of SLNB, completion lymphadenectomy (CLND), recurrence, and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were assessed. Institutional costs of melanoma care were converted to Medicare proportional dollars. A Markov model was created to estimate long-term costs. Results: Among the total 392 patients, 238 underwent SLNB. Median follow-up was 10.5 years. SLNB was positive in 19 patients (8.0%). Patients who underwent SLNB had higher 10-year nodal recurrence-free survival (98.6% vs. 91.2%, p < 0.001) but not MSS (94.4% vs. 93.2%, p = 0.55). Ulceration (HR 4.7, p = 0.022) and positive sentinel node (HR 11.5, p < 0.001) were associated with worse MSS. Estimates for 5-year costs reflect a fourfold increase in total costs of care associated with SLNB. However, a treatment plan that forgoes adjuvant therapy for resected stage IIIA melanoma but offers systemic therapy for a node-basin recurrence would nullify the additional cost of SLNB. Conclusions: SLNB is prognostic for T1b melanoma. Its impact on the overall cost of melanoma care is intimately tied to systemic therapy in the adjuvant and recurrent settings. © 2020, Society of Surgical Oncology.
Keywords: melanoma; cost-effectiveness; sentinel node biopsy
Journal Title: Annals of Surgical Oncology
Volume: 27
Issue: 13
ISSN: 1068-9265
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2020-12-01
Start Page: 5248
End Page: 5256
Language: English
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08558-8
PUBMED: 32514805
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC8366311
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 December 2020 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
MSK Authors
  1. Mary Sue Brady
    202 Brady
  2. Charlotte Eielson Ariyan
    141 Ariyan
  3. Daniel Coit
    532 Coit
  4. Andrew   Briggs
    14 Briggs
  5. Yinin Hu
    10 Hu