Prostate SBRT with intrafraction motion management using a novel linear accelerator–based MV-kV imaging method Journal Article
| Authors: | Gorovets, D.; Burleson, S.; Jacobs, L.; Ravindranath, B.; Tierney, K.; Kollmeier, M.; McBride, S.; Happersett, L.; Hunt, M.; Zelefsky, M. |
| Article Title: | Prostate SBRT with intrafraction motion management using a novel linear accelerator–based MV-kV imaging method |
| Abstract: | Purpose: This study reports clinical experience using a linear accelerator-based MV-kV imaging system for intrafraction motion management during prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods and Materials: From June 2016 to August 2018, 193 prostate SBRT patients were treated using MV-kV motion management (median dose 40 Gy in 5 fractions). Patients had 3 fiducials implanted then simulated and treated with a full bladder and empty rectum. Pretreatment orthogonal kVs and cone beam computed tomography were used to position patients and evaluate internal anatomy. Motion was tracked during volumetric modulated arc therapy delivery using simultaneously acquired kV and MV images from standard on-board systems. Treatment was interrupted to reposition patients when motion >1.5-2 mm was detected. Motion traces were analyzed and compared with Calypso traces from a previously treated similar patient cohort. To evaluate “natural motion” (ie, if we had not interrupted treatment and repositioned), intrafraction couch corrections were removed from all traces. Clinical effectiveness of the MV-kV system was explored by evaluating toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0) and biochemical recurrence rates (nadir + 2 ng/mL). Results: Median number of interruptions for patient repositioning was 1 per fraction (range, 0-9). Median overall treatment time was 8.2 minutes (range, 4.2-44.8 minutes). Predominant motion was inferior and posterior, and probability of motion increased with time. Natural motion >3 mm and >5 mm in any direction was observed in 32.3% and 10.2% of fractions, respectively. Calypso monitoring (n = 50) demonstrated similar motion results. In the 151 MV-kV patients with ≥3-month follow-up (median, 9.5 months; range, 3-26.5 months), grade ≥2 acute genitourinary/gastrointestinal and late genitourinary/gastrointestinal toxicity was observed in 9.9%/2.0% and 11.9%/2.7%, respectively. Biochemical control was 99.3% with a single failure in a high-risk patient. Conclusions: The MV-kV system is an effective method to manage intrafraction prostate motion during SBRT, offering the opportunity to correct for prostate clinical target volume displacements that would have otherwise extended beyond typical planning target volume margins. © 2020 American Society for Radiation Oncology |
| Journal Title: | Practical Radiation Oncology |
| Volume: | 10 |
| Issue: | 5 |
| ISSN: | 1879-8519 |
| Publisher: | Elsevier Inc. |
| Date Published: | 2020-09-01 |
| Start Page: | e388 |
| End Page: | e396 |
| Language: | English |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.prro.2020.04.013 |
| PUBMED: | 32454176 |
| PROVIDER: | scopus |
| DOI/URL: | |
| Notes: | Article -- Source: Scopus |
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
Related MSK Work