Blood chromogranin A is not effective as a biomarker for diagnosis or management of bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumors/neoplasms Journal Article


Authors: Matar, S.; Malczewska, A.; Oberg, K.; Bodei, L.; Aslanian, H.; Lewczuk-Myślicka, A.; Filosso, P. L.; Suarez, A. L.; Kolasińska-Ćwikła, A.; Roffinella, M.; Kos-Kudła, B.; Ćwikła, J. B.; Drozdov, I. A.; Kidd, M.; Modlin, I. M.
Article Title: Blood chromogranin A is not effective as a biomarker for diagnosis or management of bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumors/neoplasms
Abstract: Background: Identification of circulating tumor markers for clinical management in bronchopulmonary (BP) neuroendocrine tumors/neoplasms (NET/NEN) is of considerable clinical interest. Chromogranin A (CgA), a "universal" NET biomarker, is considered controversial as a circulating biomarker of BPNEN. Aim: Assess utility of CgA in the diagnosis and management of BPNEN in a multicentric study. Material and Methods: CgA diagnostic metrics were assessed in lung NET/NENs (n = 200) and controls (n = 140), randomly assigned to a Training and Test set (100 BPC and 70 controls in each). Assay specificity was evaluated in neoplastic lung disease (n = 137) and nonneoplastic lung disease (n = 77). CgA efficacy in predicting clinical status was evaluated in the combined set of 200 NET/NENs. CgA levels in bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumor (BPNET) subtypes (atypical [AC] vs. typical [TC]) and grade was examined. The clinical utility of an alteration of CgA levels (±25%) was evaluated in a subset of 49 BPNET over 12 months. CgA measurement was by NEOLISATM kit (EuroDiagnostica). Results: Sensitivity and specificity in the training set were 41/98%, respectively. Test set data were 42/87%. Training set area under receiver operator characteristic analysis differentiated BPC from control area under the curve (AUC) 0.61 ± 0.05 p = 0.015. Test set the data were AUC 0.58 ± 0.05, p = 0.076. In the combined set (n = 200), 67% BPNET/NEN (n = 134) had normal CgA levels. CgA levels did not distinguish histological subtypes (TC vs. AC, AUC 0.56 ± 0.04, p = 0.21), grade (p = 0.45-0.72), or progressive from stable disease (AUC 0.53 ± 0.05 p = 0.47). There was no correlation of CgA with Ki-67 index (Pearson r = 0.143, p = 0.14). For nonneoplastic diseases (chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis), CgA was elevated in 26-37%. For neoplastic disease (NSCLC, squamous cell carcinoma), CgA was elevated in 11-16%. The neuroendocrine SCLC also exhibited elevated CgA (50%). Elevated CgA was not useful for differentiating BPNET/NEN from these other pathologies. Monitoring BPNET/NEN over a 12-month period identified neither CgA levels per se nor changes in CgA were reflective of somatostatin analog treatment outcome/efficacy or the natural history of the disease (progression). Conclusions: Blood CgA levels are not clinically useful as a biomarker for lung BPNET/NEN. The low specificity and elevations in both nonneoplastic as well as other common neoplastic lung diseases identified limited clinical utility for this biomarker. © 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel. Copyright: All rights reserved.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; treatment outcome; aged; middle aged; major clinical study; cisplatin; capecitabine; temozolomide; lymph node metastasis; diagnostic accuracy; sensitivity and specificity; ki 67 antigen; protein blood level; etoposide; cohort analysis; retrospective study; tumor marker; enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; histology; neuroendocrine tumor; lung tumor; liver metastasis; lung adenocarcinoma; diagnostic value; biomarker; multicenter study; diagnosis; lung; carcinoid; fibrosing alveolitis; everolimus; disease exacerbation; tumor diagnosis; somatostatin derivative; bronchus tumor; chronic obstructive lung disease; labeling index; receiver operating characteristic; small cell lung cancer; non small cell lung cancer; chromogranin a; crizotinib; nivolumab; prognosis; human; male; female; priority journal; article; pembrolizumab; bronchopulmonary; squamous cell lung carcinoma; vinorelbine tartrate
Journal Title: Neuroendocrinology
Volume: 110
Issue: 3-4
ISSN: 0028-3835
Publisher: S. Karger AG  
Date Published: 2020-03-01
Start Page: 185
End Page: 197
Language: English
DOI: 10.1159/000500202
PUBMED: 30995665
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC7472424
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 April 2020 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Lisa   Bodei
    205 Bodei