Prospective genomic profiling of prostate cancer across disease states reveals germline and somatic alterations that may affect clinical decision making Journal Article


Authors: Abida, W.; Armenia, J.; Gopalan, A.; Brennan, R.; Walsh, M.; Barron, D.; Danila, D.; Rathkopf, D.; Morris, M.; Slovin, S.; McLaughlin, B.; Curtis, K.; Hyman, D. M.; Durack, J. C.; Solomon, S. B.; Arcila, M. E.; Zehir, A.; Syed, A.; Gao, J.; Chakravarty, D.; Vargas, H. A.; Robson, M. E.; Vijai, J.; Offit, K.; Donoghue, M. T. A.; Abeshouse, A. A.; Kundra, R.; Heins, Z. J.; Penson, A. V.; Harris, C.; Taylor, B. S.; Ladanyi, M.; Mandelker, D.; Zhang, L.; Reuter, V. E.; Kantoff, P. W.; Solit, D. B.; Berger, M. F.; Sawyers, C. L.; Schultz, N.; Scher, H. I.
Article Title: Prospective genomic profiling of prostate cancer across disease states reveals germline and somatic alterations that may affect clinical decision making
Abstract: Purpose A long natural history and a predominant osseous pattern of metastatic spread are impediments to the adoption of precision medicine in patients with prostate cancer.Toestablish the feasibility of clinical genomic profiling in this disease, we performed targeted deep sequencing of tumor and normal DNA from patients with locoregional, metastatic noncastrate, and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients and Methods Patients consented to genomic analysis of their tumor and germlineDNA. A hybridization capture-based clinical assay was used to identify single-nucleotide variations, small insertions and deletions, copy number alterations, and structural rearrangements in more than 300 cancer-related genes in tumors and matched normal blood. Results We successfully sequenced 504 tumors from 451 patients with prostate cancer. Potentially actionable alterations were identified in DNA damage repair, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. Twenty-seven percent of patients harbored a germline or a somatic alteration in a DNA damage repair gene that may predict for response to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. Profiling of matched tumors from individual patients revealed that somatic TP53 and BRCA2 alterations arose early in tumors from patients who eventually developed metastatic disease. In contrast, comparative analysis across disease states revealed that APC alterations were enriched in metastatic tumors, whereas ATM alterations were specifically enriched in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Conclusion Through genomic profiling of prostate tumors that represent the disease clinical spectrum, we identified a high frequency of potentially actionable alterations and possible drivers of disease initiation, metastasis, and castration resistance. Our findings support the routine use of tumor and germlineDNAprofiling for patients with advanced prostate cancer for the purpose of guiding enrollment in targeted clinical trials and counseling families at increased risk of malignancy. © 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Keywords: mitogen activated protein kinase; adult; controlled study; human tissue; aged; major clinical study; sequence analysis; single nucleotide polymorphism; somatic mutation; gene deletion; prospective study; genetic analysis; medical decision making; dna damage; gene; dna repair; metastasis; gene expression profiling; phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase; protein p53; prediction; gleason score; cancer genetics; tumor suppressor gene; gene rearrangement; gene identification; nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide adenosine diphosphate ribosyltransferase inhibitor; androgen receptor; dna sequence; cancer tissue; gene insertion; pik3ca gene; castration resistant prostate cancer; copy number variation; atm gene; germline mutation; apc gene; tp53 gene; ar gene; human; male; priority journal; article; dna damage repair gene
Journal Title: JCO Precision Oncology
Volume: 1
ISSN: 2473-4284
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2017-05-31
Language: English
DOI: 10.1200/po.17.00029
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC5558263
PUBMED: 28825054
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 23 March 2020 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Charles L Sawyers
    226 Sawyers
  2. Kenneth Offit
    791 Offit
  3. Susan Slovin
    254 Slovin
  4. Michael Morris
    586 Morris
  5. Mark E Robson
    682 Robson
  6. David Solit
    781 Solit
  7. Liying Zhang
    129 Zhang
  8. Anuradha Gopalan
    418 Gopalan
  9. Marc Ladanyi
    1333 Ladanyi
  10. David Hyman
    354 Hyman
  11. Stephen Solomon
    428 Solomon
  12. Dana Elizabeth Rathkopf
    275 Rathkopf
  13. Ahmet Zehir
    345 Zehir
  14. Vijai Joseph
    213 Joseph
  15. Michael Forman Berger
    770 Berger
  16. Maria Eugenia Arcila
    669 Arcila
  17. Victor Reuter
    1231 Reuter
  18. Howard Scher
    1131 Scher
  19. Daniel C Danila
    155 Danila
  20. Jianjiong Gao
    132 Gao
  21. Wassim Abida
    158 Abida
  22. Barry Stephen Taylor
    238 Taylor
  23. Nikolaus D Schultz
    491 Schultz
  24. Jeremy Charles Durack
    116 Durack
  25. Aijazuddin Syed
    53 Syed
  26. Kristen   Curtis
    12 Curtis
  27. David   Barron
    11 Barron
  28. Michael Francis Walsh
    156 Walsh
  29. Alexander Vincent Penson
    54 Penson
  30. Philip Wayne Kantoff
    198 Kantoff
  31. Diana Lauren Mandelker
    183 Mandelker
  32. Joshua   Armenia
    56 Armenia
  33. Zachary Joseph Heins
    22 Heins
  34. Ritika   Kundra
    90 Kundra
  35. Christopher Harris
    5 Harris