Evaluation of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma in the explanted liver with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017 Journal Article


Authors: Seo, N.; Kim, M. S.; Park, M. S.; Choi, J. Y.; Do, R. K. G.; Han, K.; Kim, M. J.
Article Title: Evaluation of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma in the explanted liver with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2017 treatment response algorithm for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) viability after locoregional therapy (LRT) using the liver explant as reference. Methods: One hundred fourteen patients with 206 HCCs who underwent liver transplantation (LT) after LRT for HCCs were included in this retrospective study. Two radiologists independently evaluated tumor viability using the LI-RADS and modified RECIST (mRECIST) with CT and MRI, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) and LR-TR viable criteria (any of three findings: APHE, washout, and enhancement pattern similar to pretreatment imaging) were compared using logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to compare the diagnostic performance between LI-RADS and mRECIST and between CT and MRI. Results: The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing viable tumor were not significantly different between APHE alone and LR-TR viable criteria on CT (p = 0.054 and p = 0.317) and MRI (p = 0.093 and p = 0.603). On CT, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of LI-RADS was significantly higher than that of mRECIST (0.733 vs. 0.657, p < 0.001). On MRI, there was no significant difference in AUCs between LI-RADS and mRECIST (0.802 vs. 0.791, p = 0.500). Intra-individual comparison of CT and MRI showed comparable AUCs using LI-RADS (0.783 vs. 0.795, p = 0.776). Conclusions: LI-RADS v2017 treatment response algorithm showed better diagnostic performance than mRECIST on CT. With LI-RADS, CT and MRI were comparable to diagnose tumor viability of HCC after LRT. Key Points: • Using Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2017 treatment response algorithm, the viability of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after locoregional therapy (LRT) can be accurately diagnosed. • LI-RADS v2017 treatment response algorithm is superior to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors for evaluating HCC viability using CT. • Either CT or MRI can be performed to assess tumor viability after LRT using LI-RADS v2017 treatment response algorithm. © 2019, European Society of Radiology.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; human tissue; treatment response; middle aged; major clinical study; hepatocellular carcinoma; chemoembolization; liver cell carcinoma; liver transplantation; comparative study; nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; antineoplastic agent; sensitivity and specificity; image analysis; retrospective study; radiologist; algorithm; diagnostic value; medical information system; radiofrequency ablation; iodinated contrast medium; predictive value; multidetector computed tomography; interrater reliability; diagnostic test accuracy study; response evaluation criteria in solid tumors; gadoterate meglumine; gadoxetic acid; human; male; female; priority journal; article; therapeutic chemoembolization; liver imaging reporting and data system
Journal Title: European Radiology
Volume: 30
Issue: 1
ISSN: 0938-7994
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2020-01-01
Start Page: 261
End Page: 271
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06376-5
PUBMED: 31418085
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC7485122
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Correction issued, see DOI 10.1007/s00330-020-07444-x -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Kinh Gian Do
    256 Do