Communicating health information and improving coordination with primary care (CHIIP): Rationale and design of a randomized cardiovascular health promotion trial for adult survivors of childhood cancer Journal Article


Authors: Chow, E. J.; Baldwin, L. M.; Hagen, A. M.; Hudson, M. M.; Gibson, T. M.; Kochar, K.; McDonald, A.; Nathan, P. C.; Syrjala, K. L.; Taylor, S. L.; Tonorezos, E. S.; Yasui, Y.; Armstrong, G. T.; Oeffinger, K. C.
Article Title: Communicating health information and improving coordination with primary care (CHIIP): Rationale and design of a randomized cardiovascular health promotion trial for adult survivors of childhood cancer
Abstract: Background: Long-term survival for children diagnosed with cancer exceeds 80%. Notably, premature cardiovascular disease has become the leading non-cancer cause of late mortality among these survivors. Methods/design: This randomized controlled trial (RCT; NCT03104543) focuses on adult participants in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study identified as high risk for ischemic heart disease or heart failure due to their cancer treatment. Participants undergo a home-based evaluation of blood pressure and laboratory tests to determine the prevalence of undiagnosed and/or undertreated hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes. Those with abnormal values are then enrolled in an RCT to test the efficacy of a 12-month personalized, remotely delivered survivorship care plan (SCP) intervention designed to reduce undertreatment of these three target conditions. The intervention approximates a clinical encounter and is based on chronic disease self-management strategies. Results: With a goal of 750, currently 342 out of 742 eligible participants approached have enrolled (46.1%). Initially, we randomized participants to different recruitment strategies, including shorter approach packets and a tiered consent, but did not find significant differences in participation rates (40.7% to 42.9%; p = .95). Subsequently, slightly greater participation was seen with larger upfront unconditional incentive checks ($50 vs. $25: 50.7% vs. 44.1%; p = .10). Overall, the financial impact of the $50 upfront incentive was cost neutral, and possibly cost-saving, vs. a $25 upfront incentive. Conclusion: The overall study will determine if a National Academy of Medicine-recommended SCP intervention can improve cardiovascular outcomes among long-term survivors of childhood cancer. Modifications to the recruitment strategy may improve participation rates over time. © 2019
Keywords: childhood cancer; cancer survivor; cardiovascular disease; abbreviations; randomized clinical trial; survivorship care plan; childhood cancer survivor study; rct; low density lipoprotein; ccss; emsi; examination management services inc.; ldl; mhlc; multidimensional health locus of control; scp
Journal Title: Contemporary Clinical Trials
Volume: 89
ISSN: 1551-7144
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2020-02-01
Start Page: 105915
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105915
PUBMED: 31862436
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC7242131
DOI/URL:
Notes: Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors