Patients' medical and psychosocial experiences after detection of a CDH1 variant with multigene panel testing Journal Article


Authors: Hamilton, J. G.; Long, J. M.; Brandt, A. C.; Brower, J.; Symecko, H.; Salo-Mullen, E. E.; Christian, S. N.; Harstad, T.; Couch, F. J.; Garber, J. E.; Offit, K.; Robson, M. E.; Domchek, S. M.
Article Title: Patients' medical and psychosocial experiences after detection of a CDH1 variant with multigene panel testing
Abstract: PURPOSE Germline CDH1 pathogenic variants (PV) are associated with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer and lobular breast cancer. Although prevalence of CDH1 PV is low in the general population, detection of these variants is increasing with the growing use of multigene panel testing. Little is known about the experiences of individuals tested for CDH1 variants in the multigene panel testing era. METHODS Participants recruited from the Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing completed a cross-sectional self-report survey regarding CDH1 genetic testing experiences, medical management, and psychosocial adaptation. RESULTS Discordance existed in interpretations of CDH1 results; 13.3% of cases had disagreements in variant classifications among commercial laboratories, and 21.4% had disagreements between participant self-report and ClinVar classification. Survey data were available from 57 individuals reporting either PV (n = 16) or variants of uncertain significance (VUS; n = 41). Those with PV were more likely than those with VUS to report receiving a recommendation for prophylactic gastrectomy, although only 40.0% of those with PV received this recommendation. Participants with VUS were less satisfied with their health care providers' knowledge and reported less CDH1 knowledge, distress, and worry about discrimination. Participants with PV perceived greater breast cancer risks, but similar gastric cancer risks, as those with VUS. CONCLUSION Few individuals with CDH1 PV report receiving recommendations for prophylactic gastrectomy, and no differences in perceived gastric cancer risk were observed based on participants' CDH1 results, suggesting serious unmet informational needs. (C) 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Keywords: risk; communication; guidelines; validation; breast-cancer; impact; gastric-cancer; prophylactic total gastrectomy; prospective-cohort; clinvar public archive
Journal Title: JCO Precision Oncology
Volume: 3
ISSN: 2473-4284
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2019-01-01
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000462683400001
DOI: 10.1200/po.18.00300
PROVIDER: wos
PMCID: PMC6738946
PUBMED: 31511843
Notes: Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Kenneth Offit
    788 Offit
  2. Mark E Robson
    676 Robson
  3. Jada Gabrielle Hamilton
    111 Hamilton