Decrease in uterine perforations with ultrasound image-guided applicator insertion in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis Journal Article


Authors: Sapienza, L. G.; Jhingran, A.; Kollmeier, M. A.; Lin, L. L.; Calsavara, V. F.; Gomes, M. J. L.; Baiocchi, G.
Article Title: Decrease in uterine perforations with ultrasound image-guided applicator insertion in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract: Purpose: To estimate uterine perforations rates during intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer with and without ultrasound (US) image guidance. Materials and methods: A systematic search of databases (PubMed and EMBASE) was performed. The pooled summary uterine perforation rate (detected by postinsertion CT or MRI) for the un-guided insertion group and the guided insertion group was calculated by using the random-effects model weighted by the inverse variance. Results: A total of 690 articles were initially found, resulting in 12 studies that met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1757 insertions and 766 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall uterine perforation rate per insertion was 4.56% (95%CI: 2.35–8.67) and per patient was 7.39% (95%CI: 3.92–13.50). The pooled perforation rate per insertion without image guidance was 10.54% (95%CI: 6.12–17.57) versus 1.06% (95%CI: 0.41–2.67) with image guidance (p < 0.01). The pooled perforation rate per patient without guidance was 16.67% (95%CI: 10.01–26.45) versus 2.54% (95%CI: 1.21–5.24) with image guidance (p < 0.01). The ratio of perforations in the un-guided/guided groups was 9.94 and 6.56, per insertion and per patient, respectively. The most common sites of perforation were the posterior wall (>47 events) and the uterine fundus (24 events). None of the studies reported significant acute clinical consequences. Prophylactic antibiotic after perforation was used in 3 of the 4 studies that described the management. Conclusion: Using postinsertion CT or MRI to detect the perforation, the rate of uterine perforation per insertion in patients who received US-guided intracavitary brachytherapy insertion is 90% lower than with un-guided insertion. © 2018 Elsevier Inc.
Keywords: controlled study; nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; computer assisted tomography; information retrieval; uterine cervix cancer; brachytherapy; medline; cervical cancer; meta-analysis; embase; intracavitary brachytherapy; medical procedures; organs at risk; gynecological cancer; human; female; priority journal; article; uterus perforation; image-guided insertion; uterine perforation; image guided applicator insertion
Journal Title: Gynecologic Oncology
Volume: 151
Issue: 3
ISSN: 0090-8258
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2018-12-01
Start Page: 573
End Page: 578
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.10.011
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 30333082
DOI/URL:
Notes: Gynecol. Oncol. -- Export Date: 2 January 2019 -- Article -- CODEN: GYNOA C2 - 30333082 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Marisa A Kollmeier
    227 Kollmeier