Modifiable failures in the colorectal cancer screening process and their association with risk of death Journal Article


Authors: Doubeni, C. A.; Fedewa, S. A.; Levin, T. R.; Jensen, C. D.; Saia, C.; Zebrowski, A. M.; Quinn, V. P.; Rendle, K. A.; Zauber, A. G.; Becerra-Culqui, T. A.; Mehta, S. J.; Fletcher, R. H.; Schottinger, J.; Corley, D. A.
Article Title: Modifiable failures in the colorectal cancer screening process and their association with risk of death
Abstract: Background & Aims: Colorectal cancer (CRC) deaths occur when patients do not receive screening or have inadequate follow-up of abnormal results or when the screening test fails. We have few data on the contribution of each to CRC-associated deaths or factors associated with these events. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients in the Kaiser Permanente Northern and Southern California systems (55–90 years old) who died of CRC from 2006 through 2012 and had ≥5 years of enrollment before diagnosis. We compared data from patients with those from a matched cohort of cancer-free patients in the same system. Receipt, results, indications, and follow-up of CRC tests in the 10-year period before diagnosis were obtained from electronic databases and chart audits. Results: Of 1750 CRC deaths, 75.9% (n = 1328) occurred in patients who were not up to date in screening and 24.1% (n = 422) occurred in patients who were up to date. Failure to screen was associated with fewer visits to primary care physicians. Of 3486 cancer-free patients, 44.6% were up to date in their screening. Patients who were up to date in their screening had a lower risk of CRC death (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.44). Failure to screen, or failure to screen at appropriate intervals, occurred in a 67.8% of patients who died of CRC vs 53.2% of cancer-free patients; failure to follow-up on abnormal results occurred in 8.1% of patients who died of CRC vs 2.2% of cancer-free patients. CRC death was associated with higher odds of failure to screen or failure to screen at appropriate intervals (odds ratio, 2.40; 95% confidence interval, 2.07–2.77) and failure to follow-up on abnormal results (odds ratio, 7.26; 95% confidence interval, 5.26–10.03). Conclusions: Being up to date on screening substantially decreases the risk of CRC death. In 2 health care systems with high rates of screening, most people who died of CRC had failures in the screening process that could be rectified, such as failure to follow-up on abnormal findings; these significantly increased the risk for CRC death. © 2019 AGA Institute
Keywords: cancer prevention; adenoma; colon cancer; early detection
Journal Title: Gastroenterology
Volume: 156
Issue: 1
ISSN: 0016-5085
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2019-01-01
Start Page: 63
End Page: 74.e6
Language: English
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.09.040
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC6309478
PUBMED: 30268788
DOI/URL:
Notes: Gastroenterology -- Export Date: 2 January 2019 -- Article -- CODEN: GASTA C2 - 30268788 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Ann G Zauber
    314 Zauber