Conventional screening measure does not accurately capture screening status in a minority of patients with colorectal cancer Journal Article


Authors: McCready, T. M.; Nandi, S.; Qian, Y.; Wen, S.; Kwon, S. C.; Zauber, A. G.; Dominitz, J. A.; Sherman, S. E.; Liang, P. S.
Article Title: Conventional screening measure does not accurately capture screening status in a minority of patients with colorectal cancer
Abstract: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) has been reported to be higher than the US general population, but CRC remains a prevalent cancer within the VA system. To examine CRC predictors and the extent to which the conventional definition of up-to-date screening applies to the population, we conducted a case-control study using VA data from 2012 to 2018. We classified patients into 5 categories: up-to-date or not up-to-date average-risk patients aged 50 to 75 (Categories 1 and 2), up-to-date or not up-to-date average-risk patients aged <50 or >75 (Categories 3 and 4), and high-risk patients (Category 5). Each CRC case was matched by age, sex, and facility with 4 controls. We performed multivariable conditional logistic regression, adjusting for race and ethnicity, diabetes, obesity, and alcohol use. Among 3714 CRC cases identified, Category 4 (odds ratio [OR] 1.40, 95% CI 1.11-1.78) and Category 5 (OR 6.23, 95% CI 5.06-7.66) patients had a higher risk of CRC compared to Category 1 patients. Compared with White patients, Black patients had a higher risk (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.37-1.73). Diabetes (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.51-1.81) and alcohol use disorder (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.35-1.73) were also associated with CRC. Most CRC cases occurred in individuals aged 50 to 75, but 12.5% occurred in persons who were outside of this age range or had high-risk personal or family history. The conventional measure of CRC screening, focused on average-risk individuals aged 50 to 75, does not reflect screening status in an important minority of CRC patients. © 2025 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; aged; major clinical study; case control study; cancer patient; colorectal cancer; cancer screening; high risk patient; age; screening; diabetes mellitus; logistic regression analysis; race difference; veteran; caucasian; alcoholism; veterans health; human; male; female; article; black person
Journal Title: Medicine
Volume: 104
Issue: 29
ISSN: 0025-7974
Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc  
Date Published: 2025-07-18
Start Page: e43593
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000043593
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC12282814
PUBMED: 40696574
DOI/URL:
Notes: Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Ann G Zauber
    315 Zauber