Immediate postablation (18)F-FDG injection and corresponding SUV are surrogate biomarkers of local tumor progression after thermal ablation of colorectal carcinoma liver metastases Journal Article


Authors: Cornelis, F. H.; Petre, E. N.; Vakiani, E.; Klimstra, D.; Durack, J. C.; Gonen, M.; Osborne, J.; Solomon, S. B.; Sofocleous, C. T.
Article Title: Immediate postablation (18)F-FDG injection and corresponding SUV are surrogate biomarkers of local tumor progression after thermal ablation of colorectal carcinoma liver metastases
Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine whether intraprocedural 18F-FDG PET/CT can be used as a predictor of local tumor progression after percutaneous ablation of colorectal liver metastases. Methods: In this institutional review board-approved prospective study, 39 patients (19 men and 20 women; median age, 56 y) underwent split-dose 18F-FDG PET/CT-guided ablation followed by immediate biopsy and contrast-enhanced CT imaging of the ablation zone. Binary categorization of biopsy tissues was performed on the basis of the presence of only nonviable coagulation necrosis or viable tumor cells. Minimum ablation margin measurements from contrast-enhanced CT imaging were categorized as 0 mm, 1- 4 mm, 5-9 mm, or greater than or equal to 10 mm. SUVs were obtained from PET/CT imaging, and SUV ratios were calculated from 3-dimensional regions of interest located in the ablation zone and surrounding normal liver. All predictive variables (biopsy, minimum margin distance, and SUV ratio) were evaluated as predictors of time to local tumor progression identified on imaging using competing-risks regression models (uni- and multivariate analyses). Results: A total of 62 consecutive ablations were evaluated. The mean SUV ratio was significantly higher for viable tumor-positive immediate postablation biopsies (n = 10) than for tumor-negative biopsies (n = 2) (85.8 ± 92.2 vs. 42.3 ± 45.5) (P = 0.03) and for a minimum margin size of less than = mm (n = 15) than for a minimum margin size of greater than or equal to 5 mm (n = 47) (78.5 ± 99.1 vs. 38.3 ± 78.5) (P = 0.01). After a median follow-up period of 22.5 (range, 7-52) months, 23 of 62 ablated tumors showed local tumor progression (37.1%). The local tumor progression rate was significantly higher for viable tumor-positive biopsies (8/10) than for negative biopsies (15/52) (80% vs. 29%) (P = 0.001) and for a minimum margin size of less than = mm (9/15) than for a minimum margin size of greater than or equal to 10 mm (2/15) (60% vs. 13%) (P = 0.02) but not 5-9 mm (37.5%; 12/32) (P = 0.5). In a competing-risks analysis, biopsy results (P = 0.07) and the minimum margin size (P = 0.08) were borderline significant, but the SUV ratio was not (P = 0.22). However, for negative biopsy ablations, the minimum margin size and SUV ratio were predictive imaging factors for local tumor progression; subdistribution hazard ratios were 0.564 (0.325-0.978) (P = 0.04) and 1.005 (1.001-1.009) (P = 0.005), respectively. Conclusion: The SUV ratio and minimum margin size can independently predict colorectal metastasis local tumor progression after liver ablation when there are no viable tumor cells on immediate postablation biopsies. © 2018 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
Keywords: recurrence; interventional radiology; pet/ct; thermal ablation; imaging biomarkers
Journal Title: Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Volume: 59
Issue: 9
ISSN: 0161-5505
Publisher: Society of Nuclear Medicine  
Date Published: 2018-09-01
Start Page: 1360
End Page: 1365
Language: English
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.194506
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC6126442
PUBMED: 29439012
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 October 2018 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Joseph R Osborne
    61 Osborne
  2. Mithat Gonen
    1029 Gonen
  3. David S Klimstra
    978 Klimstra
  4. Stephen Solomon
    422 Solomon
  5. Elena Nadia Petre
    108 Petre
  6. Efsevia Vakiani
    264 Vakiani
  7. Jeremy Charles Durack
    116 Durack