Endoscopic Ultrasound Can Improve the Selection for Laparoscopy in Patients with Localized Gastric Cancer Journal Article


Authors: Power, D. G.; Schattner, M.; Gerdes, H.; Brenner, B.; Markowitz, A. J.; Capanu, M.; Coit, D. G.; Brennan, M.; Kelsen, D. P.; Shah, M. A.
Article Title: Endoscopic Ultrasound Can Improve the Selection for Laparoscopy in Patients with Localized Gastric Cancer
Abstract: Background: The majority of newly diagnosed patients with gastric cancer have disease that is not resectable because of local extension or metastatic (M1) disease. Laparoscopy is a recommended staging evaluation to identify occult peritoneal metastatic disease. We determined if endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) could improve the selection of patients for laparoscopy. Study Design: Gastric cancer patients being screened for a preoperative chemotherapy clinical trial were prospectively examined. Patients underwent standard preoperative assessment. Those without obvious metastatic disease were referred for EUS and laparoscopy. EUS divided patients into risk categories for metastatic disease: low risk (T1-2, N0) and high risk (T3-4, N+, or both). Laparoscopy categories were M1 and M0. The ability of EUS to predict subradiographic peritoneal metastatic disease was evaluated. Results: Ninety-four patients were studied. The majority were EUS high risk (72%). Occult metastatic disease was identified in 19 patients, 18 of whom had high-risk EUS stage. The yields of identifying M1 disease by laparoscopy in EUS high- and low-risk patients were 25% (95% CI, 15% to 37%) and 4% (95% CI, 0.1% to 20%), respectively. The negative predictive value of low-risk EUS for laparoscopy and pathologic M0 was 96% (exact 95% CI, 80% to 100%). Conclusions: This study suggested that laparoscopy can be avoided in patients with EUS early-stage gastric cancer. Patients with more advanced disease are at higher risk of occult peritoneal disease and require laparoscopy. Validation with greater numbers is warranted, but, based on these data, we propose a new staging algorithm allowing EUS low-risk patients to proceed directly to resection. © 2009 American College of Surgeons.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; aged; middle aged; cancer surgery; major clinical study; cancer localization; patient selection; cancer staging; neoplasm staging; laparoscopy; preoperative evaluation; prospective studies; peritoneal neoplasms; risk factors; validation study; algorithms; high risk patient; risk assessment; algorithm; early diagnosis; predictive value of tests; stomach cancer; peritoneum metastasis; stomach neoplasms; endoscopic echography; endosonography; stomach radiography
Journal Title: Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume: 208
Issue: 2
ISSN: 1072-7515
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2009-02-01
Start Page: 173
End Page: 178
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.022
PUBMED: 19228527
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 1" - "Export Date: 30 November 2010" - "CODEN: JACSE" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Baruch Brenner
    10 Brenner
  2. Murray F Brennan
    1059 Brennan
  3. Hans Gerdes
    176 Gerdes
  4. Arnold J Markowitz
    138 Markowitz
  5. Marinela Capanu
    385 Capanu
  6. Derek Gerard Power
    38 Power
  7. Manish Shah
    177 Shah
  8. Daniel Coit
    542 Coit
  9. Mark Schattner
    168 Schattner
  10. David P Kelsen
    537 Kelsen