Response to ERBB3-directed targeted therapy in NRG1-rearranged cancers Journal Article


Authors: Drilon, A.; Somwar, R.; Mangatt, B. P.; Edgren, H.; Desmeules, P.; Ruusulehto, A.; Smith, R. S.; Delasos, L.; Vojnic, M.; Plodkowski, A. J.; Sabari, J.; Ng, K.; Montecalvo, J.; Chang, J.; Tai, H.; Lockwood, W. W.; Martinez, V.; Riely, G. J.; Rudin, C. M.; Kris, M. G.; Arcila, M. E.; Matheny, C.; Benayed, R.; Rekhtman, N.; Ladanyi, M.; Ganji, G.
Article Title: Response to ERBB3-directed targeted therapy in NRG1-rearranged cancers
Abstract: NRG1 rearrangements are oncogenic drivers that are enriched in invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas (IMA) of the lung. The oncoprotein binds ERBB3–ERBB2 heterodimers and activates downstream signaling, supporting a therapeutic paradigm of ERBB3/ ERBB2 inhibition. As proof of concept, a durable response was achieved with anti-ERBB3 mAb therapy (GSK2849330) in an exceptional responder with an NRG1 -rearranged IMA on a phase I trial (NCT01966445). In contrast, response was not achieved with anti-ERBB2 therapy (afatinib) in four patients with NRG1 -rearranged IMA (including the index patient post-GSK2849330). Although in vitro data supported the use of either ERBB3 or ERBB2 inhibition, these clinical results were consistent with more profound antitumor activity and downstream signaling inhibition with anti-ERBB3 versus anti-ERBB2 therapy in an NRG1 -rearranged patient-derived xenograft model. Analysis of 8,984 and 17,485 tumors in The Cancer Genome Atlas and MSK-IMPACT datasets, respectively, identifi ed NRG1 rearrangements with novel fusion partners in multiple histologies, including breast, head and neck, renal, lung, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, and uterine cancers. SIGnIFICAnCE: This series highlights the utility of ERBB3 inhibition as a novel treatment paradigm for NRG1 -rearranged cancers. In addition, it provides preliminary evidence that ERBB3 inhibition may be more optimal than ERBB2 inhibition. The identifi cation of NRG1 rearrangements across various solid tumors supports a basket trial approach to drug development. © 2018 American Association for Cancer Research.
Journal Title: Cancer Discovery
Volume: 8
Issue: 6
ISSN: 2159-8274
Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research  
Date Published: 2018-06-01
Start Page: 686
End Page: 695
Language: English
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-17-1004
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC5984717
PUBMED: 29610121
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 July 2018 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Natasha Rekhtman
    434 Rekhtman
  2. Kenneth K Ng
    58 Ng
  3. Marc Ladanyi
    1332 Ladanyi
  4. Gregory J Riely
    603 Riely
  5. Romel Somwar
    111 Somwar
  6. Maria Eugenia Arcila
    669 Arcila
  7. Mark Kris
    871 Kris
  8. Alexander Edward Drilon
    635 Drilon
  9. Charles Rudin
    494 Rudin
  10. Rym Benayed
    188 Benayed
  11. Lukas   Delasos
    14 Delasos
  12. Jason Chih-Peng Chang
    142 Chang
  13. Roger Stephen Smith
    20 Smith
  14. Joshua K Sabari
    36 Sabari
  15. Morana Vojnic
    17 Vojnic
  16. Hui-Chun Tai
    4 Tai