The role of surgery in metastatic bladder cancer: A systematic review Journal Article


Authors: Abufaraj, M.; Dalbagni, G.; Daneshmand, S.; Horenblas, S.; Kamat, A. M.; Kanzaki, R.; Zlotta, A. R.; Shariat, S. F.
Article Title: The role of surgery in metastatic bladder cancer: A systematic review
Abstract: Context: The role of surgery in metastatic bladder cancer (BCa) is unclear. Objective: In this collaborative review article, we reviewed the contemporary literature on the surgical management of metastatic BCa and factors associated with outcomes to support the development of clinical guidelines as well as informed clinical decision-making. Evidence acquisition: A systematic search of English language literature using PubMed-Medline and Scopus from 1999 to 2016 was performed. Evidence synthesis: The beneficial role of consolidation surgery in metastatic BCa is still unproven. In patients with clinically evident lymph node metastasis, data suggest a survival advantage for patients undergoing postchemotherapy radical cystectomy with lymphadenectomy, especially in those with measurable response to chemotherapy (CHT). Intraoperatively identified enlarged pelvic lymph nodes should be removed. Anecdotal reports of resection of pulmonary metastasis as part of multimodal approach suggest possible improved survival in well-selected patients. Cytoreductive radical cystectomy as local treatment has also been explored in patients with metastatic disease, although its benefits remain to be assessed. Conclusions: Consolidative extirpative surgery may be considered in patients with clinically evident pelvic or retroperitoneal lymph nodal metastases but only if they have had a response to CHT. Surgery for limited pulmonary metastases may also be considered in very selected cases. Best candidates are those with resectable disease who demonstrate measurable response to CHT with good performance status. In the absence of data from prospective randomized studies, each patient should be evaluated on an individual basis and decisions made together with the patient and multidisciplinary teams. Patient summary: Surgical resection of metastases is technically feasible and can be safely performed. It may help improve cancer control and eventually survival in very selected patients with limited metastatic burden. In a patient who is motivated to receive chemotherapy and to undergo extirpative surgical intervention, surgery should be discussed with the patient among other consolidation therapies in the setting of multidisciplinary teams. A multimodal approach that includes radical cystectomy and lymphadenectomy seems to improve cancer control and survival in bladder cancer patients with nodal metastasis. Metastasectomy is feasible and can be safely performed with a possible survival advantage in well-selected patients. © 2017 European Association of Urology
Keywords: cancer chemotherapy; cancer survival; review; multimodality cancer therapy; cancer patient; lymph node metastasis; lymph node dissection; paraaortic lymph node; pelvis lymph node; cytoreductive surgery; local therapy; evidence based practice; practice guideline; diagnostic imaging; bladder cancer; distant metastasis; lung metastasis; systematic review; intraoperative period; cystectomy; surgery; medline; lymphadenopathy; metastasectomy; surgical patient; phase 3 clinical trial (topic); clinical outcome; metastasis resection; integrated health care system; human; priority journal; metastatic bladder cancer; scopus
Journal Title: European Urology
Volume: 73
Issue: 4
ISSN: 0302-2838
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2018-04-01
Start Page: 543
End Page: 557
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.09.030
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 29122377
PMCID: PMC8177016
DOI/URL:
Notes: Review -- Export Date: 2 April 2018 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Guido Dalbagni
    325 Dalbagni