Impact of contemporary patterns of chemotherapy utilization on survival in patients with advanced cancer of the urinary tract: A Retrospective International Study of Invasive/Advanced Cancer of the Urothelium (RISC) Journal Article


Authors: Bamias, A.; Tzannis, K.; Harshman, L. C.; Crabb, S. J.; Wong, Y. N.; Kumar Pal, S.; De Giorgi, U.; Ladoire, S.; Agarwal, N.; Yu, E. Y.; Niegisch, G.; Necchi, A.; Sternberg, C. N.; Srinivas, S.; Alva, A.; Vaishampayan, U.; Cerbone, L.; Liontos, M.; Rosenberg, J.; Powles, T.; Bellmunt, J.; Galsky, M. D.; RISC Investigators
Article Title: Impact of contemporary patterns of chemotherapy utilization on survival in patients with advanced cancer of the urinary tract: A Retrospective International Study of Invasive/Advanced Cancer of the Urothelium (RISC)
Abstract: Background: Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is the standard treatment of advanced urinary tract cancer (aUTC), but 50% of patients are ineligible for cisplatin according to recently published criteria. We used a multinational database to study patterns of chemotherapy utilization in patients with aUTC and determine their impact on survival. Patients and methods: This was a retrospective study of patients with: UTC (bladder, renal pelvis, ureter or urethra); advanced disease (stages T4b and/or N+ and/or M+); urothelial, squamous or adenocarcinoma histology. Primary objective was overall survival (OS). Eligibility-for-cisplatin was defined by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status≤1, creatinine clearance≥60 ml/min, no hearing loss, no neuropathy and no heart failure. Cox regression multivariate analyses were used to establish independent associations of cisplatin versus noncisplatin-based chemotherapy on OS. Results: About 1794 patients treated between 2000 and 2013 at 29 centers were analyzed. Median follow-up was 29.1 months. About 1333 patients (74%) received first-line chemotherapy: the use of first-line chemotherapy was associated with longer OS: [hazard ratio (HR): 1.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.67-2.20]. Type of first-line chemotherapy received was: cisplatin-based 669 (50%), carboplatin-based 399 (30%) and other 265 (20%). Cisplatin use was an independent favorable prognostic factor (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.35-1.77). This benefit was independent of baseline characteristics or comorbidities but was associated with eligibility-for-cisplatin: eligible patients treated with cisplatin lived longer than those who were not (HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.36-2.21), while such benefit was not observed among ineligible patients. About 26% of patients who did not receive cisplatin were eligible for this agent. Median OS of ineligible patients was poor irrespective of the chemotherapy used. Conclusions: The importance of applying published criteria of eligibility-for-cisplatin was confirmed in a multinational, realworld setting in aUTC. The reasons for deviations from these criteria set targets to improve adherence. Effective therapies for cisplatin-ineligible patients are needed. © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved.
Keywords: chemotherapy; urothelial cancer; cisplatin eligibility
Journal Title: Annals of Oncology
Volume: 29
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0923-7534
Publisher: Oxford University Press  
Date Published: 2018-02-01
Start Page: 361
End Page: 369
Language: English
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx692
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 29077785
PMCID: PMC7360142
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 April 2018 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jonathan Eric Rosenberg
    510 Rosenberg