Decreasing smoking but increasing stigma? Anti-tobacco campaigns, public health, and cancer care Journal Article


Authors: Riley, K. E.; Ulrich, M. R.; Hamann, H. A.; Ostroff, J. S.
Article Title: Decreasing smoking but increasing stigma? Anti-tobacco campaigns, public health, and cancer care
Abstract: Public health researchers, mental health clinicians, philosophers, and medical ethicists have questioned whether the public health benefits of large-scale anti-tobacco campaigns are justified in light of the potential for exacerbating stigma toward patients diagnosed with lung cancer. Although there is strong evidence for the public health benefits of anti-tobacco campaigns, there is a growing appreciation for the need to better attend to the unintended consequence of lung cancer stigma. We argue that there is an ethical burden for creators of public health campaigns to consider lung cancer stigma in the development and dissemination of hard-hitting anti-tobacco campaigns. We also contend that health care professionals have an ethical responsibility to try to mitigate stigmatizing messages of public health campaigns with empathic patient-clinician communication during clinical encounters. © 2017 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
Keywords: neoplasm; neoplasms; psychology; smoking; health promotion; tobacco; advertising as topic; advertising; social stigma; humans; human; smoking prevention
Journal Title: AMA Journal of Ethics
Volume: 19
Issue: 5
ISSN: 2376-6980
Publisher: American Medical Association  
Date Published: 2017-05-01
Start Page: 475
End Page: 485
Language: English
DOI: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.5.msoc1-1705
PUBMED: 28553905
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC5679230
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 March 2018 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jamie S Ostroff
    344 Ostroff
  2. Kristen E Riley
    15 Riley