Impact of surgeon specialty on perioperative outcomes of surgery for benign esophageal diseases: A NSQIP analysis Journal Article


Authors: Khoshhal, Z.; Canner, J.; Schneider, E.; Stem, M.; Haut, E.; Schlottmann, F.; Barbetta, A.; Mungo, B.; Lidor, A.; Molena, D.
Article Title: Impact of surgeon specialty on perioperative outcomes of surgery for benign esophageal diseases: A NSQIP analysis
Abstract: Background: Surgery for benign esophageal disease is mostly performed either by general surgeons (GS) or cardiothoracic surgeons (CTS) in the United States. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of surgeon specialty on perioperative outcomes of surgery for benign esophageal diseases. Materials and Methods: We have conducted a retrospective analysis using the ACS-NSQIP during the period of 2006-2013. Patients who underwent paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair, gastric fundoplication, or Heller esophagomyotomy were divided into two groups according to the specialty of the surgeon (GS or CTS). Outcomes compared between the two groups using multivariable logistic regression included 30-day mortality, overall morbidity, discharge destination, hospital length of stay (LOS), and readmission rates. Results: Most of the surgeries were performed by general surgeons (PEH: 97.1%; fundoplication: 97.6%; Heller: 91.6%). Patients had lower comorbidities, better physical condition, and underwent a laparoscopic approach more frequently in the GS group. Regression analysis showed that GS group had a lower mortality rate (operating room, 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.86; P = .017), shorter LOS, and more home discharge for patients undergoing PEH repair. Mortality, morbidity, readmission, LOS, and home discharge were comparable between GS and CTS in fundoplication and Heller esophagomyotomy. Conclusion: GS perform most of esophageal surgeries for benign diseases. GS group has better outcomes in PEH repair compared with CTS, whereas there is no difference in the overall outcomes between GS and CTS in fundoplication and Heller esophagomyotomy. These results show that specialization is not always the answer to better outcomes. Difference in outcomes, however, might be related to disease severity, approach needed, or case volume. © Copyright 2017, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2017.
Keywords: outcomes; benign disease; esophageal surgery
Journal Title: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques
Volume: 27
Issue: 9
ISSN: 1092-6429
Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc  
Date Published: 2017-09-01
Start Page: 924
End Page: 930
Language: English
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2017.0083
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 28594583
PMCID: PMC5749579
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 October 2017 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Daniela   Molena
    271 Molena