Trends and factors associated with radical cytoreductive surgery in the United States: A case for centralized care Journal Article


Authors: Sinno, A. K.; Li, X.; Thompson, R. E.; Tanner, E. J. 3rd; Levinson, K. L.; Stone, R. L.; Temkin, S. M.; Fader, A. N.; Chi, D. S.; Long Roche, K.
Article Title: Trends and factors associated with radical cytoreductive surgery in the United States: A case for centralized care
Abstract: Objectives To describe the US national trends and factors associated with cytoreductive surgical radicality in women with advanced ovarian cancer (OC). Methods An analysis of the National Inpatient Sample database was performed. All admissions from 1993 to 2011 for advanced OC cytoreductive surgery (CRS) were identified and categorized as simple pelvic (SP), extensive pelvic (EP), and extensive upper abdominal (EUA) surgery. Annual trends in CRS were analyzed. Associations between patient- and hospital-specific factors, with CRS radicality as well as perioperative complications were explored between 2007 and 2011. Results In total, 28,677 un-weighted admissions were analyzed. The rate of EP and EUA resections increased over time (8% to 18.1% and 1.3% to 5.4%, P < 0.01, respectively). On multivariate analysis, patients were more likely to undergo EUA resections in the Northeast (OR 1.44) or West Coast (OR 1.47) at urban (OR 2.3), or large hospitals (OR 1.4), or if they had private insurance (OR 1.45). EUA surgeries were performed more frequently at high-volume ovarian cancer centers (OR 2.65); additionally, fewer complications were observed after EUA at high compared with low and medium volume hospitals (10.2%, 21.2%, and 21.7%, respectively; P = 0.01). Specifically, patients treated at high volume hospitals experienced lower rates of hemorrhage, vascular/nerve injury, prolonged hospitalization, and non-routine discharge than at lower (P < 0.05). Conclusions The US rate of radical cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer is increasing. At high-volume hospitals, patients receive more radical surgery with fewer complications, supporting further study of a centralized ovarian cancer care model. © 2017
Keywords: ovarian cancer; cytoreductive surgery; debulking; disparities; centralized care; upper abdominal procedures
Journal Title: Gynecologic Oncology
Volume: 145
Issue: 3
ISSN: 0090-8258
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2017-06-01
Start Page: 493
End Page: 499
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.03.020
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 28366546
PMCID: PMC5576026
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 3 July 2017 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Dennis S Chi
    707 Chi