Pathophysiology and contributing factors in postprostatectomy incontinence: A review Journal Article


Authors: Heesakkers, J.; Farag, F.; Bauer, R. M.; Sandhu, J.; De Ridder, D.; Stenzl, A.
Article Title: Pathophysiology and contributing factors in postprostatectomy incontinence: A review
Abstract: Context The incidence and awareness of postprostatectomy incontinence (PPI) has increased during the past few years, probably because of an increase in prostate cancer surgery. Many theories have been postulated to explain the pathophysiology of PPI. Objective The current review scrutinizes various pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the occurrence of PPI. Evidence acquisition A search was conducted on PubMed and EMBASE for publications on PPI. The primary search returned 2518 publications. Animal and basic research studies, letters, publications on prostatectomy for benign reasons, pathology of prostatic carcinoma, radiotherapy and hormone therapy of prostatic carcinoma, and review articles were all used as criteria for exclusion from the study. A total of 128 publications were selected for final analysis. Evidence synthesis Neuromuscular anatomic elements and pelvic support are known to influence PPI as evidenced by multiple publications. A number of non-anatomic and surgical elements have been postulated as contributing factors to PPI. Biological factors and preoperative parameters include: functional bladder changes, age, body mass index (BMI), pre-existing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), prostate size, and oncologic factors. Multiple studies reported the impact of specific anatomic/surgical factors, including fibrosis, shorter membranous urethral length (MUL), anastomotic stricture, damage to the neurovascular bundle, and extensive dissection, all of which have a negative impact on the continence status of patients following radical prostatectomy (RP). Investigation of the impact of techniques to spare the bladder neck and additional procedures to reconstruct the posterior or anterior support structures (eg, the Rocco stitch) on continence status is ongoing. Conclusions Anatomic support and pelvic innervation appear to be important factors in the etiology of PPI. Biological/preoperative factors including greater age at time of surgery, pre-existing LUTS, high BMI, shorter MUL, and functional bladder changes have a negative impact on continence after RP. Extensive dissection during surgery, damage to the neurovascular bundle, and postoperative fibrosis also have a substantial negative impact on the continence status of men undergoing RP. Sparing of the bladder neck and anterior fixation of the bladder-urethra anastomosis are associated with better continence rates. There is still debate about whether posterior pelvic reconstruction leads to better postoperative continence rates. Patient summary Radical prostatectomy is an oncologic procedure and thus requires removal of the entire prostate gland and seminal vesicles, ideally with negative surgical margins. This sometimes results in urinary incontinence. The factors contributing to urinary incontinence are explained in this article. © 2016 European Association of Urology
Keywords: pathophysiology; fibrosis; prostatectomy; urinary incontinence; innervation; urinary sphincter
Journal Title: European Urology
Volume: 71
Issue: 6
ISSN: 0302-2838
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2017-06-01
Start Page: 936
End Page: 944
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.031
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 27720536
DOI/URL:
Notes: Review -- Export Date: 1 June 2017 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
MSK Authors
  1. Jaspreet Sandhu
    126 Sandhu