Integrating oncology massage into chemoinfusion suites: A program evaluation Journal Article


Authors: Mao, J. J.; Wagner, K. E.; Seluzicki, C. M.; Hugo, A.; Galindez, L. K.; Sheaffer, H.; Fox, K. R.
Article Title: Integrating oncology massage into chemoinfusion suites: A program evaluation
Abstract: Objective This article reports on the development, implementation, and evaluation of an integrative clinical oncology massage program for patients undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer in a large academic medical center. Materials and Methods We describe the development and implementation of an oncology massage program embedded into chemoinfusion suites. We used deidentified program evaluation data to identify specific reasons individuals refuse massage and to evaluate the immediate impact of massage treatments on patient-reported outcomes using a modified version of the Distress Thermometer delivered via iPad.Weanalyzed premassage and postmassage data from the Distress Thermometer using paired t test and derived qualitative data from participants who provided written feedback on their massage experiences. Results Of the 1,090 massages offered, 692 (63%) were accepted. We observed a significant decrease in self-reported anxiety (from 3.9 to 1.7), nausea (from 2.5 to 1.2), pain (from 3.3 to 1.9), and fatigue (from 4.8 to 3.0) premassage and postmassage, respectively (all P , .001). We found that 642 survey participants (93%) were satisfied with their massage, and 649 (94%) would recommend it to another patient undergoing treatment. Spontaneous patient responses overwhelmingly endorsed the massage as relaxing. No adverse events were reported. Amongthe 398 patients (36%)whodeclined a massage, top reasons were time concerns and lack of interest. Conclusion A clinical oncology massage program can be safely and effectively integrated into chemoinfusion units to provide symptom control for patients with breast cancer. This integrative approach overcomes patient-level barriers of cost, time, and travel, and addresses the institutional-level barrier of space. © 2017 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
Journal Title: Journal of Oncology Practice
Volume: 13
Issue: 3
ISSN: 1554-7477
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2017-03-01
Start Page: e207
End Page: e216
Language: English
DOI: 10.1200/jop.2016.015081
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 28045616
PMCID: PMC5702787
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 May 2017 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jun J Mao
    247 Mao