Response rate as a regulatory end point in single-arm studies of advanced solid tumors Journal Article


Authors: Oxnard, G. R.; Wilcox, K. H.; Gonen, M.; Polotsky, M.; Hirsch, B. R.; Schwartz, L. H.
Article Title: Response rate as a regulatory end point in single-arm studies of advanced solid tumors
Abstract: Importance: Objective response rate (ORR) is an increasingly important end point for accelerated development of highly active anticancer therapies, yet its relationship to regulatory approval is not well characterized. Objective: To identify circumstances in which a high ORR is associated with regulatory approval, and therefore might be an appropriate end point for definitive single-arm studies of anticancer therapies. Data Source: A database of all oncology clinical trials registered at clinicaltrials.gov between October 1, 2007, and September 30, 2010. Study Selection: Trials of palliative systemic therapies for 4 measurable solid tumor types, limited to those with trial arms of at least 20 patients reporting ORR per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Data Extraction and Synthesis: A systematic searchwas used to identify the reported ORR for each eligible treatment arm that had been presented publicly. Main Outcomes and Measures: For each treatment regimen, defined as a single-agent or unique combination of agents for 1 cancer type, the mean ORR and the maximum ORR statistically exceeded were calculated, and their association with regulatory approval was studied. A regimen was considered approved for a specific cancer type if it had received regulatory approval in any country for treatment of advanced cancer of that type. Results: From 1800 trials, 874 eligible trial arms in 578 eligible trials were identified; 542 arms had ORR data available for 294 regimens. Maximum ORR and mean ORR were significantly associated with regulatory approval (τ = 0.27, P < .001; τ = 0.12, P = .01); this relationship was stronger for single-agent therapies (τ = 0.49; τ = 0.41) than for combination regimens (τ = 0.28; τ = 0.17). Evaluation of ORR thresholds between 20%and 60%as potential trial end points demonstrated that ORR statistically exceeding 30% with a single agent had 98%specificity and 89%positive predictive value for identifying regimens achieving regulatory approval. Conclusions and Relevance: For single-agent regimens, high ORR was associated with regulatory approval; this relationship was less strong for combination regimens. Our data suggest that high ORR (eg, statistically exceeding an ORR of 30%) is an appropriate end point for single-arm trials aiming to demonstrate breakthrough activity of a single-agent anticancer therapy. Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Journal Title: JAMA Oncology
Volume: 2
Issue: 6
ISSN: 2374-2437
Publisher: American Medical Association  
Date Published: 2016-06-01
Start Page: 772
End Page: 779
Language: English
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.6315
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 26914340
PMCID: PMC5574183
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 March 2017 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Mithat Gonen
    1028 Gonen