Patient regrets after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy Journal Article


Authors: Borgen, P. I.; Hill, A. D. K.; Tran, K. N.; Van Zee, K. J.; Massie, M. J.; Payne, D.; Biggs, C. G.
Article Title: Patient regrets after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy
Abstract: Background: The discovery of a cadre of breast cancer susceptibility genes has resulted in an increase in the number of women seeking information about prophylactic breast surgery, but virtually no large-scale prospective databases exist to assist women considering prophylactic mastectomy. Methods: The authors constructed a National Prophylactic Mastectomy Registry comprised of a volunteer population of 817 women from 43 states who have undergone prophylactic mastectomy. Results: In the registry, 370 women had undergone bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. Twenty-one (5%) women expressed regrets about the procedure. The median follow-up was 14.6 years (mean 14.8 years; range 0.2-51 years). Those with regrets were subsetted into those with major (n = 10) or minor (n = 7) regrets. Regrets were more common in those women with whom discussion about prophylactic mastectomy was initiated by a physician (19/255), compared with patients who initiated the discussion themselves (2/108; P < .05). Conclusions: The overall satisfaction rate of 95% reported here may be explained by the voluntary nature of this registry. The most important factor that predicts an unfavorable outcome following bilateral prophylactic mastectomy is a physician-initiated discussion.
Keywords: adult; treatment outcome; aged; middle aged; patient satisfaction; cancer surgery; major clinical study; genetics; united states; follow-up studies; genetic predisposition to disease; cancer prevention; breast cancer; mastectomy; breast neoplasms; registries; cancer registry; chi-square distribution; emotions; prophylactic mastectomy; humans; human; female; article
Journal Title: Annals of Surgical Oncology
Volume: 5
Issue: 7
ISSN: 1068-9265
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 1998-10-01
Start Page: 603
End Page: 606
Language: English
PUBMED: 9831108
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI: 10.1007/BF02303829
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Presented at the 51st Annual Cancer Symposium of the Society of Surgical Oncology that took place March 26-29, 1998 in San Diego, CA -- Export Date: 12 December 2016 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Kimberly J Van Zee
    293 Van Zee
  2. Arnold D Hill
    16 Hill
  3. David K Payne
    19 Payne
  4. Patrick I Borgen
    253 Borgen
  5. Mary Jane Massie
    80 Massie
  6. Katherine N Tran
    15 Tran
  7. Carina G Biggs
    1 Biggs