Electronic patient-reported outcomes from home in patients recovering from major gynecologic cancer surgery: A prospective study measuring symptoms and health-related quality of life Journal Article


Authors: Cowan, R. A.; Suidan, R. S.; Andikyan, V.; Rezk, Y. A.; Einstein, M. H.; Chang, K.; Carter, J.; Zivanovic, O.; Jewell, E. J.; Abu-Rustum, N. R.; Basch, E.; Chi, D. S.
Article Title: Electronic patient-reported outcomes from home in patients recovering from major gynecologic cancer surgery: A prospective study measuring symptoms and health-related quality of life
Abstract: Purpose We previously reported on the feasibility of a Web-based system to capture patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the immediate postoperative period. The purpose of this study was to update the experience of these patients and assess patient and provider satisfaction and feedback regarding the system. Methods This is a prospective cohort study of patients scheduled to undergo laparotomy for presumed gynecologic malignancy. Patients completed a Web-based Symptom Tracking and Reporting (STAR) questionnaire preoperatively and weekly during a 6-week postoperative period. Email alerts were sent to study nurses when concerning patient responses were entered. The patient and the nurse assessments of STAR's usefulness were measured via an exit survey. Results The study enrolled 96 eligible patients. Of these, 71 patients (74%) completed at least four of seven total sessions. Of the patients who completed the exit satisfaction survey, 98% found STAR easy to use; 84% found it useful; and 82% would recommend it to other patients. Despite positive feedback from patients, clinical personnel found that the STAR system increased their current workload without enhancing patient care. Conclusions Application of an electronic program for PROs in those recovering from major gynecologic cancer surgery is feasible, and acceptable to most patients. While most clinicians did not find STAR clinically helpful, the majority of patients reported a positive experience with the system and would recommend its use. The program helped many patients feel more empowered in their postoperative recovery. © 2016 Elsevier Inc.
Keywords: quality of life; patient-reported outcomes; gynecologic cancer; gynecologic surgery
Journal Title: Gynecologic Oncology
Volume: 143
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0090-8258
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2016-11-01
Start Page: 362
End Page: 366
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.08.335
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 27637366
PMCID: PMC5535805
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 6 December 2016 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Elizabeth Jewell
    131 Jewell
  2. Dennis S Chi
    707 Chi
  3. Oliver Zivanovic
    291 Zivanovic
  4. Jeanne Carter
    159 Carter
  5. Kaity Chang
    8 Chang
  6. Renee Antonette Woodburn Cowan
    32 Cowan