Choreographing couch and collimator in volumetric modulated arc therapy Journal Article


Authors: Yang, Y.; Zhang, P.; Happersett, L.; Xiong, J.; Yang, J.; Chan, M.; Beal, K.; Mageras, G.; Hunt, M.
Article Title: Choreographing couch and collimator in volumetric modulated arc therapy
Abstract: Purpose: To design and optimize trajectory-based, noncoplanar subarcs for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) deliverable on both Varian TrueBEAM system and traditional accelerators; and to investigate their potential advantages for treating central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Methods and Materials: To guide the computerized selection of beam trajectories consisting of simultaneous couch, gantry, and collimator motion, a score function was implemented to estimate the geometric overlap between targets and organs at risk for each couch/gantry angle combination. An initial set of beam orientations is obtained as a function of couch and gantry angle, according to a minimum search of the score function excluding zones of collision. This set is grouped into multiple continuous and extended subarcs subject to mechanical limitations using a hierarchical clustering algorithm. After determination of couch/gantry trajectories, a principal component analysis finds the collimator angle at each beam orientation that minimizes residual target-organ at risk overlaps. An in-house VMAT optimization algorithm determines the optimal multileaf collimator position and monitor units for control points within each subarc. A retrospective study of 10 CNS patients compares the proposed method of VMAT trajectory with dynamic gantry, leaves, couch, and collimator motion (Tra-VMAT); a standard noncoplanar VMAT with no couch/collimator motion within subarcs (Std-VMAT); and noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans that were clinically used. Results: Tra-VMAT provided improved target dose conformality and lowered maximum dose to brainstem, optic nerves, and chiasm by 7.7%, 1.1%, 2.3%, and 1.7%, respectively, compared with Std-VMAT. Tra-VMAT provided higher planning target volume minimum dose and reduced maximum dose to chiasm, optic nerves, and cochlea by 6.2%, 1.3%, 6.3%, and 8.4%, respectively, and reduced cochlea mean dose by 8.7%, compared with IMRT. Tra-VMAT averaged beam-on time was comparable to Std-VMAT but significantly (45%) less than IMRT. Conclusion: Optimized couch, gantry, and collimator trajectories may be integrated into VMAT with improved mechanical flexibility and may provide better dosimetric properties and improved efficiency in the treatment of CNS tumors. © 2011 Elsevier Inc.
Keywords: clinical article; intensity modulated radiation therapy; treatment planning; cancer radiotherapy; radiation dose; radiotherapy; retrospective study; central nervous system tumor; intensity-modulated radiotherapy; physical therapy; tumors; central nervous systems; collimator; optic nerve; brain stem; eye protection; optic chiasm; optimization; volumetric modulated arc therapy; mean dose; cochlea; risk perception; organs at risks; principal component analysis; brainstem; gantry angles; monitor units; optimal multileaf collimator; planning target volumes; trajectories; volumetric arc modulated therapy; cns tumors; trajectory based; beam orientation; beam trajectories; cns tumor; control point; dose conformality; dosimetric properties; hierarchical clustering algorithms; mechanical flexibility; non-coplanar; optimization algorithms; score function; sub-arc; clustering algorithms; mechanical properties; optical collimators; beam therapy; target organ
Journal Title: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Volume: 80
Issue: 4
ISSN: 0360-3016
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2011-07-15
Start Page: 1238
End Page: 1247
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.016
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 21377811
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Export Date: 17 August 2011" - "CODEN: IOBPD" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Maria F Chan
    190 Chan
  2. Kathryn Beal
    221 Beal
  3. Pengpeng Zhang
    175 Zhang
  4. Gikas S Mageras
    277 Mageras
  5. Yingli Yang
    3 Yang
  6. Margie A Hunt
    287 Hunt
  7. Jianping Xiong
    23 Xiong
  8. Jie Yang
    50 Yang