Clinical outcomes with pemetrexed-based systemic therapies in RET-rearranged lung cancers Journal Article


Authors: Drilon, A.; Bergagnini, I.; Delasos, L.; Sabari, J.; Woo, K. M.; Plodkowski, A.; Wang, L.; Hellmann, M. D.; Joubert, P.; Sima, C. S.; Smith, R.; Somwar, R.; Rekhtman, N.; Ladanyi, M.; Riely, G. J.; Kris, M. G.
Article Title: Clinical outcomes with pemetrexed-based systemic therapies in RET-rearranged lung cancers
Abstract: Background: RET rearrangements are targetable, oncogenic lung cancer drivers. While previous series have showndurable clinical benefit with pemetrexed-based therapies in ALK- and ROS1-rearranged lung cancers, the benefits of pemetrexed-based treatments in patients with RET-rearranged lung cancers relative to other genomic subsets have not previously been explored. Patients and methods: A retrospective review of patients with pathologically confirmed stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinomas and evidence of a RET, ROS1, or ALK rearrangement, or a KRAS mutation was conducted. Patients were eligible if they received treatment with pemetrexed alone or in combination. The primary outcome of progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary outcomes of overall response rate (ORR, RECIST v1.1), time to progression (TTP), and time to treatment discontinuation were compared between RET-rearranged and groups of ROS1-rearranged, ALK-rearranged, and KRAS-mutant lung cancers. Results: We evaluated 104 patients. Patients with RET-rearranged lung cancers (n = 18) had a median PFS of 19 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 12-not reached (NR)] that was comparable with patients with ROS1- (23 months, 95% CI 14-NR, n = 10) and ALK-rearranged (19 months, 95% CI 15-36, n = 36) lung cancers, and significantly improved compared with patients with KRAS-mutant lung cancers (6 months, 95% CI 5-9, P <0.001, n = 40). ORR (45%), media TTP (20 months, 95% CI 17-NR), and median time to treatment discontinuation (21 months, 95% CI 6-NR) in patients with RET-rearranged lung cancers were not significantly different compared with patients with ALK- and ROS1-rearranged lung cancers, and improved compared with patients with KRAS-mutant lung cancers. Conclusion: Durable benefits with pemetrexed-based therapies in RET-rearranged lung cancers are comparable with ALK- and ROS1-rearranged lung cancers. When selecting therapies for patients with RETrearranged lung cancers, pemetrexed-containing regimens should be considered. © The Author 2016.
Keywords: pemetrexed; non-small-cell lung cancer; ret rearrangement
Journal Title: Annals of Oncology
Volume: 27
Issue: 7
ISSN: 0923-7534
Publisher: Oxford University Press  
Date Published: 2016-07-01
Start Page: 1286
End Page: 1291
Language: English
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw163
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC4922319
PUBMED: 27056998
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 August 2016 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Camelia S Sima
    212 Sima
  2. Natasha Rekhtman
    434 Rekhtman
  3. Marc Ladanyi
    1332 Ladanyi
  4. Gregory J Riely
    603 Riely
  5. Romel Somwar
    111 Somwar
  6. Lu Wang
    147 Wang
  7. Mark Kris
    871 Kris
  8. Alexander Edward Drilon
    635 Drilon
  9. Matthew David Hellmann
    412 Hellmann
  10. Kaitlin Marie Woo
    101 Woo
  11. Lukas   Delasos
    14 Delasos
  12. Roger Stephen Smith
    20 Smith
  13. Joshua K Sabari
    36 Sabari