Methods for implementing and reporting patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of symptomatic adverse events in cancer clinical trials Journal Article


Authors: Basch, E.; Rogak, L. J.; Dueck, A. C.
Article Title: Methods for implementing and reporting patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of symptomatic adverse events in cancer clinical trials
Abstract: Purpose: There is increasing interest to use patient reported outcome (PRO) measures to evaluate symptomatic adverse events (AEs) in cancer treatment trials. However, there are currently no standard recommended approaches for integrating patient-reported AE measures into trials. Methods: Approaches are identified from previous trials for selecting AEs for solicited patient reporting, administering patient-reported AE measures, and analyzing and reporting results. Findings: Approaches for integrating patient reported AE measures into cancer trials generally combine current standard methods for clinician reported AEs and established best practices for using PRO measures. Specific AEs can be selected for a PRO questionnaire based on common and expected reactions in a given trial context, derived from literature review and qualitative/mixed-methods evaluations and should be the same set administered across all arms of a trial. A mechanism for collecting unsolicited patient-reported AEs will also ideally be included. Patients will preferably report at baseline and at the end of active treatment as well as on a frequent standardized schedule during active treatment, such as weekly from home, with a recall period corresponding to the frequency of reporting (eg, past 7 days). Less frequent reporting may be considered after an initial intensive monitoring period for trials of prolonged treatments and during long-term follow-up. Electronic PRO data collection is preferred. Backup data collection for missed PRO reports is advisable to boost response rates. Analysis can use a combination of approaches to AE and PRO data. If a high proportion of patients is experiencing baseline symptoms, systematic subtraction of these from on-study AEs should be considered to improve reporting of symptoms related to treatment. More granular longitudinal analyses of individual symptoms can also be useful. Implications: Methods are evolving for integrating patient-reported symptomatic AEs into cancer trials. These methods are expected to further evolve as more data from trials become available. (C) 2016 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: accuracy; oncology; questionnaire; symptom; voice; toxicity; adverse event; common terminology criteria; patient-reported outcome; version; ctcae; equivalence; Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; cancer
Journal Title: Clinical Therapeutics
Volume: 38
Issue: 4
ISSN: 0149-2918
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2016-04-01
Start Page: 821
End Page: 830
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000375734700015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.011
PROVIDER: wos
PMCID: PMC4851916
PUBMED: 27045992
Notes: Editorial Material -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
MSK Authors
  1. Ethan Martin Basch
    180 Basch
  2. Lauren Jayne Rogak
    76 Rogak