Multicentric cancer detected at breast MR imaging and not at mammography: Important or not? Journal Article
| Authors: | Iacconi, C.; Galman, L.; Zheng, J.; Sacchini, V.; Sutton, E. J.; Dershaw, D.; Morris, E. A. |
| Article Title: | Multicentric cancer detected at breast MR imaging and not at mammography: Important or not? |
| Abstract: | Purpose: To review the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and pathologic features of multicentric cancer detected only at MR imaging and to evaluate its potential biologic value. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant; informed consent was waived. A review of records from 2001 to 2011 yielded 2021 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer who underwent biopsy after preoperative MR imaging, 285 (14%) of whom had additional cancer detected at MR imaging that was occult at mammography. In 73 patients (3.6%), MR imaging identified 87 cancers in different quadrants than the known index cancer, constituting the basis of this report. In 62 of 73 patients (85%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 75, 92), one additional cancer was found, and in 11 of 73 (15%; 95% CI: 8, 25), multiple additional cancers were found. A x2 test with adjustment for multiple lesions was used to examine whether MR imaging and pathologic features differ between the index lesion and additional multicentric lesions seen only at MR imaging. Results: Known index cancers were more likely to be invasive than MR imagingdetected multicentric cancers (88% vs 76%, P =.023). Ductal carcinoma in situ (21 of 87 lesions [24%]; 95% CI: 15, 36) represented a minority of additional MR imagingdetected multicentric cancers. Overall, the size of MR imagingdetected multicentric invasive cancers (median, 0.6 cm; range, 0.16.3 cm) was smaller than that of the index cancer (median, 1.2 cm; range, 0.057.0 cm; P =.023), although 17 of 73 (23%) (95% CI: 14, 35) patients had larger MR imagingdetected multicentric cancers than the known index lesion, and 18 of 73 (25%) (95% CI: 15, 36) had MR imagingdetected multicentric cancers larger than 1 cm. MR imagingdetected multicentric cancers and index cancers differed in histologic characteristics, invasiveness, and grade in 27 of 73 (37%) patients (95% CI: 26, 49). In four of 73 (5%) patients (95% CI: 2, 13), MR imagingdetected multicentric cancers were potentially more biologically relevant because of the presence of unsuspected invasion or a higher grade. Conclusion: Multicentric cancer detected only at MR imaging was invasive in 66 of 87 patients (76%), larger than 1 cm in 18 of 73 patients (25%), larger than the known index cancer in 17 of 73 patients (23%), and more biologically important in four of 73 women (5%). An unsuspected additional multicentric cancer seen only at MR imaging is likely clinically relevant disease. © 2015 RSNA. |
| Journal Title: | Radiology |
| Volume: | 279 |
| Issue: | 2 |
| ISSN: | 0033-8419 |
| Publisher: | Radiological Society of North America, Inc. |
| Date Published: | 2016-05-01 |
| Start Page: | 378 |
| End Page: | 384 |
| Language: | English |
| DOI: | 10.1148/radiol.2015150796 |
| PROVIDER: | scopus |
| PUBMED: | 26605912 |
| PMCID: | PMC5015863 |
| DOI/URL: | |
| Notes: | Article -- Export Date: 2 June 2016 -- Source: Scopus |
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
Related MSK Work