Impact of NRAS mutations for patients with advanced melanoma treated with immune therapies Journal Article


Authors: Johnson, D. B.; Lovly, C. M.; Flavin, M.; Panageas, K. S.; Ayers, G. D.; Zhao, Z.; Iams, W. T.; Colgan, M.; De Noble, S.; Terry, C. R.; Berry, E. G.; Iafrate, A. J.; Sullivan, R. J.; Carvajal, R. D.; Sosman, J. A.
Article Title: Impact of NRAS mutations for patients with advanced melanoma treated with immune therapies
Abstract: Activating NRAS mutations are found in 15% to 20% of melanomas. Immune therapies have become a mainstay in advanced melanoma treatment. We sought to evaluate whether tumor genotype (e.g., NRAS mutations) correlates with benefit from immune therapy in melanoma. We identified 229 patients with melanoma treated with immune therapies [IL2, ipilimumab, or anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1)] at three centers and compared clinical outcomes following immune therapy for patients with or without NRAS mutations. Of the 229 patients with melanoma, 60 had NRAS mutation, 53 had BRAF mutation, and 116 had NRAS/BRAF wild type. The NRAS-mutant cohort had superior or a trend to superior outcomes compared with the other cohorts in terms of response to first-line immune therapy (28% vs. 16%, P = 0.04), response to any line of immune therapy (32% vs. 20%, P = 0.07), clinical benefit (response + stable disease lasting >24 weeks; 50% vs. 31%, P < 0.01), and progression-free survival (median, 4.1 vs. 2.9 months, P = 0.09). Benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 was particularly marked in the NRAS cohort (clinical benefit rate 73% vs. 35%). In an independent group of patient samples, NRAS-mutant melanoma had higher PD-L1 expression (although not statistically significant) compared with other genotypes (8/12 vs. 9/20 samples with >1% expression; 6/12 vs. 6/20 samples with >5% expression), suggesting a potential mechanism for the clinical results. This retrospective study suggests that NRAS mutations in advanced melanoma correlate with increased benefit from immune-based therapies compared with other genetic subtypes. If confirmed by prospective studies, this may be explained in part by high rates of PD-L1 expression. © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research.
Keywords: middle aged; retrospective studies; genetics; mutation; clinical trial; interleukin 2; ipilimumab; melanoma; membrane proteins; retrospective study; monoclonal antibody; antibodies, monoclonal; immunotherapy; multicenter study; membrane protein; interleukin-2; gtp phosphohydrolases; guanosine triphosphatase; humans; prognosis; human; male; female; nras protein, human
Journal Title: Cancer Immunology Research
Volume: 3
Issue: 3
ISSN: 2326-6066
Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research  
Date Published: 2015-03-01
Start Page: 288
End Page: 295
Language: English
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-14-0207
PUBMED: 25736262
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC4351797
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 May 2016 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Katherine S Panageas
    512 Panageas
  2. Marisa Harkins Flavin
    3 Flavin
  3. Marta Nalysnyk Colgan
    3 Colgan