Impact of the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program on clinical trial and related activities at a community cancer center in rural Nebraska Journal Article


Authors: Copur, M. S.; Ramaekers, R.; Gönen, M.; Gulzow, M.; Hadenfeldt, R.; Fuller, C.; Scott, J.; Einspahr, S.; Benzel, H.; Mickey, M.; Norvell, M.; PharmD; Clark, D.; Gauchan, D.; Kurbegov, D.
Article Title: Impact of the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program on clinical trial and related activities at a community cancer center in rural Nebraska
Abstract: Purpose: Although 85% of patients with cancer are diagnosed and treated in the community setting, only 3% are enrolled onto clinical trials. Lack of adequate time, infrastructure, resources, incentives, and reimbursement adversely affect clinical trial participation. In July 2007, Saint Francis Cancer Treatment Center (SFCTC) in Grand-Island, Nebraska, was selected as one of the initial 16 sites for the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program (NCCCP). Methods: Clinical trial and related activities data at SFCTC 5 years before and 5 years during the NCCCP were gathered and compared. Data included information on patients in clinical trials, number and type of trials, ratio of underserved patients, staffing, collection and storage of tissue samples, availability of new cancer services, and organizational infrastructure and linkage to National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers. Results: The number and percentage of patients enrolled onto clinical trials increased from 89 (3.2%) to 640 (23%; P <.001). All enrollees were rural Nebraskans, with 70% age >65 years. Available treatment and non-treatment (eg, prevention, biospecimen, cancer control) trials increased from eight and three per year to 28 and 12 per year (P5.012), respectively. Staffing increased from 1.2 to 3.9 full-time equivalents (P=.012). A genetic counselor, smoking cessation counselor, and outreach project coordinator and two nurse navigators were hired. The number of tissue samples collected and/or stored increased from 26 (19%) to 320 (52%; P< .001). Conclusion: NCCCP participation had a direct and positive impact on all activities, with enhanced access to expanded types of trials and cancer care services. Our data demonstrate the feasibility of successful implementation of an expanded spectrum of clinical trials and programs in a rural community. Copyright © 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Journal Title: Journal of Oncology Practice
Volume: 12
Issue: 1
ISSN: 1554-7477
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2016-01-01
Start Page: 67-68, e44
End Page: e51
Language: English
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 26265173
DOI: 10.1200/jop.2015.005736
PMCID: PMC4976454
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 3 March 2016 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Mithat Gonen
    1032 Gonen