Standards for anal sphincter replacement Journal Article


Authors: Madoff, R. D.; Baeten, C. G. M. I.; Christiansen, J.; Rosen, H. R.; Williams, N. S.; Heine, J. A.; Lehur, P. A.; Lowry, A. C.; Lubowski, D. Z.; Matzel, K. E.; Nicholls, R. J.; Seccia, M.; Thorson, A. G.; Wexner, S. D.; Wong, W. D.
Article Title: Standards for anal sphincter replacement
Abstract: PURPOSE: Anal sphincter replacement offers a new treatment option for patients with severe refractory fecal incontinence or for those who require abdominoperineal resection for localized malignancy. The purpose of this study was to review the current status of anal sphincter replacement, formulate a consensus statement regarding its current use, and outline suggestions for future development. METHODS: Four areas of interests were selected: indications for sphincter replacement, continence scoring and quality of life, choice of therapy, and dissemination of new technology. A questionnaire regarding these issues was developed and circulated to working party members; its results served as the basis for this consensus document. RESULTS: Both electrically stimulated skeletal muscle neosphincter and artificial anal sphincter are options for patients with end-stage fecal incontinence. Electrically stimulated skeletal muscle neosphincter is also appropriate for reconstruction after surgical excision of the anorectum in selected cases. Avoidance of complications requires strict attention to sterile technique, prophylactic antibiotics, and deep venous thrombus prophylaxis. A standardized scoring system is proposed that evaluates both continence and evacuation. Quality of life is a critical endpoint for assessing sphincter replacement, and use of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons incontinence-specific quality-of-life instrument is recommended. As the efficacy of sphincter replacement becomes proven, dissemination of the technique should occur in a controlled manner to ensure adequate surgeon training, minimization of complications, and optimization of results. CONCLUSIONS: Sphincter replacement by electrically stimulated skeletal muscle neosphincter and artificial anal sphincter provide a continent option for patients with end-stage fecal incontinence and those requiring abdominoperineal resection. The guidelines offered in this document are intended to facilitate the controlled and safe development and acceptance of these new techniques.
Keywords: fecal incontinence; sphincter; sphincter replacement; neosphincter; artificial anal
Journal Title: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
Volume: 43
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0012-3706
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2000-02-01
Start Page: 135
End Page: 141
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000085430800001
DOI: 10.1007/bf02236969
PROVIDER: wos
PUBMED: 10696884
Notes: Article; Proceedings Paper -- Presented at the 11th World Congress of Gastroenterology in Vienna, Austria on Sep 6-11, 1998 -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Douglas W Wong
    178 Wong