Melanoma: A multidisciplinary approach for the general surgeon Journal Article
| Authors: | Reeves, M. E.; Coit, D. G. |
| Article Title: | Melanoma: A multidisciplinary approach for the general surgeon |
| Abstract: | Advances in the understanding of the biology and treatment of melanoma have moved the care of melanoma patients into an increasingly multidisciplinary environment. Surgeons must understand these advances because they will often be responsible for directing the overall care of these patients. Most patients with melanomas more than 1 mm in diameter and no evidence of metastatic disease should be offered SLNB to more accurately stage them and direct decisions about participation in postoperative adjuvant therapy trials. Until the results of the MSLT are known, the effect of SLNB and ELND on outcome remains unknown. SLNs should be analyzed with serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry to avoid missing micrometastatic disease. Based on the results of the ECOG-1684 trial, the FDA approved IFN-α(2b) for the adjuvant treatment of melanoma patients with thick primary tumors (> 4 mm) or resected nodal disease. IFN-α(2b) treatment is expensive and potentially toxic. The data from ECOG-1684 do not support the use of IFN- α(2b) in patients with node-negative disease. In light of the ECOG-1690 trial results, the role of high-dose IFN-α(2b) in the management of patients with resected nodal disease is considerably less clear. Any recommendations for treatment with high-dose IFNα(2b) should be made only after weighing the costs, side effects, and potential benefits for individual patients. Numerous, less toxic, promising, adjuvant immunotherapeutic strategies have been developed and are being tested in multicenter, prospective, randomized trials. These strategies include GMK, PMCV, and Melacine. If the results of any of these trials show a survival advantage compared with placebo or equivalent survival compared with IFN-α(2b), these immunotherapeutic agents will become the adjuvant treatment of choice for patients with resected high- risk melanoma. RT-PCR detection of tyrosinase in SLNs can identify patients with submicroscopic nodal disease who may be at increased risk for recurrence or death from melanoma. An ongoing, prospective, randomized trial will determine whether patients with histologically negative but RT-PCR-positive SLNs will benefit from lymphadenectomy or adjuvant IFN-α(2b) therapy. RT-PCR can also identify minimal residual disease in peripheral blood and bone marrow from patients with high-risk melanoma, but RT-PCR analysis of peripheral blood and bone marrow is still experimental, and procedural details need to be standardized and prospectively validated in large patient groups before its use can be considered the standard of care. |
| Keywords: | cancer survival; controlled study; survival rate; unclassified drug; major clinical study; clinical trial; review; patient selection; cancer adjuvant therapy; chemotherapy, adjuvant; lymph node metastasis; lymph node dissection; lymphatic metastasis; neoplasm staging; lymph node excision; alpha2b interferon; melanoma; reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; controlled clinical trial; liver toxicity; phase 2 clinical trial; skin neoplasms; randomized controlled trial; high risk patient; drug cost; patient care team; multicenter study; cancer size; phase 3 clinical trial; monophenol monooxygenase; melacine; lymph node biopsy; ganglioside gm2; clinical trials; cell lysate; keyhole limpet hemocyanin; elective surgery; qs 21; melanoma vaccine; hapten; vaccinia oncolysate; phosphoryl lipid a; humans; human; priority journal; ganglioside gm2 keyhole limpet hemocyanin vaccine; gmk vaccine |
| Journal Title: | Surgical Clinics of North America |
| Volume: | 80 |
| Issue: | 2 |
| ISSN: | 0039-6109 |
| Publisher: | Elsevier Inc. |
| Date Published: | 2000-04-01 |
| Start Page: | 581 |
| End Page: | 601 |
| Language: | English |
| PUBMED: | 10836008 |
| PROVIDER: | scopus |
| DOI: | 10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70202-4 |
| DOI/URL: | |
| Notes: | Export Date: 18 November 2015 -- Source: Scopus |
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
Related MSK Work