Prospective assessment of primary rectal cancer response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy using 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography Journal Article


Authors: Guillem, J. G.; Puig-la Calle, J. Jr; Akhurst, T.; Tickoo, S.; Ruo, L.; Minsky, B. D.; Gollub, M. J.; Klimstra, D. S.; Mazumdar, M.; Paty, P. B.; Macapinlac, H.; Yeung, H.; Saltz, L.; Finn, R. D.; Erdi, Y.; Humm, J.; Cohen, A. M.; Larson, S.
Article Title: Prospective assessment of primary rectal cancer response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy using 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography
Abstract: PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the ability of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to assess extent of pathologically confirmed rectal cancer response to preoperative radiation and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with primary rectal cancer deemed eligible for preoperative radiation and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy because of a clinically bulky or tethered tumor or endorectal ultrasound evidence of T3 and/or N1 were prospectively enrolled. Positron emission tomography and CT scans were obtained before preoperative radiation and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (5,040 cGy to the pelvis and 2 cycles of bolus 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin) and repeated four to five weeks after completion of radiation and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. In addition to routine pathologic staging, detailed assessment of rectal cancer response to preoperative radiation and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy was performed independently by two pathologists. Positron emission tomography parameters studied included conventional measures such as standardized uptake value (average and maximum), positron emission tomography-derived tumor volume (size), and two novel parameters: visual response score and change in total lesion glycolysis. RESULTS: Of 21 patients enrolled, prospective data (pretreatment and posttreatment positron emission tomography, and complete pathologic assessment) were available on 15 patients. All 15 demonstrated pathologic response to preoperative radiation and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. This was confirmed in 100 percent of the cases by positron emission tomography compared with 78 percent (7/9) by CT. In addition, one positron emission tomography parameter (visual response score) accurately estimated the extent of pathologic response in 60 percent (9/15) of cases compared with 22 percent (2/9) of cases with CT. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates that fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging adds incremental information to the preoperative assessment of patients with rectal cancer. However, further studies in a larger series of patients are needed to verify these findings and to determine the value of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in a preoperative strategy aimed at identifying patients suitable for sphincter-preserving rectal cancer surgery.
Keywords: clinical article; cancer surgery; fluorouracil; cancer combination chemotherapy; patient selection; cancer radiotherapy; preoperative care; neoadjuvant therapy; chemotherapy; antineoplastic agent; neoplasm staging; prospective study; prospective studies; radiopharmaceuticals; computer assisted tomography; antimetabolites, antineoplastic; radiotherapy dosage; adenocarcinoma, mucinous; tomography, x-ray computed; furosemide; pilot projects; folinic acid; fluorodeoxyglucose f 18; fluorodeoxyglucose f18; remission induction; preoperative treatment; rectal neoplasms; rectum cancer; glycolysis; rectum surgery; positron emission tomography (pet); rectal cancer; tomography, emission-computed; positive end expiratory pressure; humans; human; article; preoperative radiation
Journal Title: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
Volume: 43
Issue: 1
ISSN: 0012-3706
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2000-01-01
Start Page: 18
End Page: 24
Language: English
PUBMED: 10813118
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI: 10.1007/BF02237238
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 18 November 2015 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Leonard B Saltz
    790 Saltz
  2. Philip B Paty
    496 Paty
  3. Bruce Minsky
    306 Minsky
  4. Marc J Gollub
    208 Gollub
  5. Madhu Mazumdar
    127 Mazumdar
  6. Henry W D Yeung
    126 Yeung
  7. Leyo Ruo
    32 Ruo
  8. Ronald D Finn
    279 Finn
  9. Satish K Tickoo
    483 Tickoo
  10. Jose Guillem
    414 Guillem
  11. Alfred M Cohen
    244 Cohen
  12. David S Klimstra
    978 Klimstra
  13. Timothy J Akhurst
    139 Akhurst
  14. John Laurence Humm
    433 Humm
  15. Yusuf E Erdi
    118 Erdi
  16. Steven M Larson
    958 Larson