Chylothorax and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury associated with robotic video-assisted mediastinal lymph node dissection Journal Article


Authors: Sarkaria, I. S.; Finley, D. J.; Bains, M. S.; Adusumilli, P. S.; Rizk, N. P.; Huang, J.; Downey, R. J.; Rusch, V. W.; Jones, D. R.
Article Title: Chylothorax and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury associated with robotic video-assisted mediastinal lymph node dissection
Abstract: Objective: Although the technical aspects of robotic video-assisted thoracic surgery (RVATS) for lung resections may be advantageous, compared with standard thoracoscopy, complications of chylothorax and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (RLNI) associated with mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) may be significant. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent RVATS anatomic lung resection for suspected or confirmed cancer and experienced RLNI or chylothorax were identified and reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. Complications were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Results: From July 28, 2010, to December 20, 2013, 251 patients underwent RVATS segmentectomy, lobectomy, or bilobectomy with MLND. Eleven patients (4.4%) experienced MLND-related complications and composed the study group; 81.8% were right-sided resections, and the median lymph node counts in right station IV and station VII were 9 (range, 1-23) and 5.5 (range, 1-10); 72.7% of the cases were performed for early-stage I and II lung cancers. Chylothorax [6/251 (2.4%)] and RLNI [6/251 (2.4%)] were significantly more common in the RVATS group than in the open thoracotomy and standard VATS groups. Complications requiring procedural intervention (Grade 3) are as follows: 4 cases of RLNI in patients undergoing percutaneous vocal cord medialization and 3 cases of chylothorax in patients undergoing image-guided thoracic duct embolization or maceration. No operative interventions were required. Conclusions: RVATS MLND may be associated with increased rates of chylothorax and RLNI. Attention must be paid to identifying potential technical pitfalls with RVATS lung resections, adjusting surgical techniques accordingly, and minimizing patient morbidity. Copyright © 2015 by the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery.
Keywords: controlled study; major clinical study; artificial embolism; conference paper; cancer staging; lymph node dissection; prospective study; disease association; lung resection; thoracotomy; incidence; lung cancer; complications; lobectomy; vats; thoracoscopy; video assisted thoracoscopic surgery; robotic surgery; mediastinal lymph node dissection; chylothorax; bilobectomy; recurrent laryngeal nerve injury; human; priority journal; segmentectomy; robot assisted surgery; robotic video assisted mediastinal lymph node dissection; thoracic duct embolization
Journal Title: Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery
Volume: 10
Issue: 3
ISSN: 1556-9845
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2015-05-01
Start Page: 170
End Page: 173
Language: English
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 26165562
DOI: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000160
PMCID: PMC4981881
DOI/URL:
Notes: Presented at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery, May 28-31, 2014 in Boston, MA -- Export Date: 2 November 2015 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Valerie W Rusch
    864 Rusch
  2. Nabil Rizk
    139 Rizk
  3. James Huang
    214 Huang
  4. Robert J Downey
    254 Downey
  5. Manjit S Bains
    338 Bains
  6. David Randolph Jones
    417 Jones