Validation of an RNA cell cycle progression score for predicting death from prostate cancer in a conservatively managed needle biopsy cohort Journal Article


Authors: Cuzick, J.; Stone, S.; Fisher, G.; Yang, Z. H.; North, B. V.; Berney, D. M.; Beltran, L.; Greenberg, D.; Müller, H.; Reid, J. E.; Gutin, A.; Lanchbury, J. S.; Brawer, M.; Scardino, P.
Article Title: Validation of an RNA cell cycle progression score for predicting death from prostate cancer in a conservatively managed needle biopsy cohort
Abstract: Background: The natural history of prostate cancer is highly variable and difficult to predict accurately. Better markers are needed to guide management and avoid unnecessary treatment. In this study, we validate the prognostic value of a cell cycle progression score (CCP score) independently and in a prespecified linear combination with standard clinical variables, that is, a clinical-cell-cycle-risk (CCR) score.Methods: Paraffin sections from 761 men with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed by needle biopsy and managed conservatively in the United Kingdom, mostly between 2000 and 2003. The primary end point was prostate cancer death. Clinical variables consisted of centrally reviewed Gleason score, baseline PSA level, age, clinical stage, and extent of disease; these were combined into a single predefined risk assessment (CAPRA) score. Full data were available for 585 men who formed a fully independent validation cohort.Results: In univariate analysis, the CCP score hazard ratio was 2.08 (95% CI (1.76, 2.46), P<10-13) for one unit change of the score. In multivariate analysis including CAPRA, the CCP score hazard ratio was 1.76 (95% CI (1.44, 2.14), P<10-6). The predefined CCR score was highly predictive, hazard ratio 2.17 (95% CI (1.83, 2.57), χ 2 =89.0, P<10-20) and captured virtually all available prognostic information.Conclusions: The CCP score provides significant pretreatment prognostic information that cannot be provided by clinical variables and is useful for determining which patients can be safely managed conservatively, avoiding radical treatment. © 2015 Cancer Research UK. All rights reserved.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; human tissue; aged; cancer surgery; major clinical study; clinical feature; multimodality cancer therapy; cancer radiotherapy; cancer staging; cancer grading; prostate specific antigen; cohort analysis; validation study; retrospective study; cancer mortality; age; risk assessment; prostate cancer; gleason score; rna; conservative treatment; prostatectomy; needle biopsy; scoring system; united kingdom; predictive value; cancer prognosis; human; male; priority journal; article; prognostic assessment; genital system disease assessment; cancer of the prostate risk assessment; cell cycle progression score; clinical cell cycle risk score
Journal Title: British Journal of Cancer
Volume: 113
Issue: 3
ISSN: 0007-0920
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group  
Date Published: 2015-07-28
Start Page: 382
End Page: 389
Language: English
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.223
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC4522632
PUBMED: 26103570
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 2 September 2015 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Peter T Scardino
    671 Scardino