Extent of microinvasion in ductal carcinoma in situ is not associated with sentinel lymph node metastases Journal Article


Authors: Matsen, C. B.; Hirsch, A.; Eaton, A.; Stempel, M.; Heerdt, A.; Van Zee, K. J.; Cody, H. S. 3rd; Morrow, M.; Plitas, G.
Article Title: Extent of microinvasion in ductal carcinoma in situ is not associated with sentinel lymph node metastases
Abstract: Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) is a rare diagnosis with a good prognosis. Although nodal metastases are uncommon, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) remains standard care. Volume of disease in invasive breast cancer is associated with SLNB positivity, and, thus we hypothesized that in a large cohort of patients with DCISM, multiple foci of microinvasion might be associated with a higher risk of positive SLNB. Methods: Records from a prospective institutional database were reviewed to identify patients with DCISM who underwent SLNB between June 1997 and December 2010. Pathology reports were reviewed for number of microinvasive foci and categorized as 1 focus or ≥2 foci. Demographic, pathologic, treatment, and outcome data were obtained and analyzed. Results: Of 414 patients, 235 (57 %) had 1 focus of microinvasion and 179 (43 %) had ≥2 foci. SLNB macrometastases were found in 1.4 %, and micrometastases were found in 6.3 %; neither were significantly different between patients with 1 focus versus ≥2 foci (p = 1.0). Patients with positive SLNB or ≥2 foci of microinvasion were more likely to receive chemotherapy. At median 4.9 years (range 0–16.2 years) follow-up, 18 patients, all in the SLNB negative group, had recurred for an overall 5-year recurrence-free proportion of 95.9 %. Conclusions: Even with large numbers, there was no higher risk of nodal involvement with ≥2 foci of microinvasion compared with 1 focus. Number of microinvasive foci and results of SLNB appear to be used in decision making for systemic therapy. Prognosis is excellent. © 2014, Society of Surgical Oncology.
Journal Title: Annals of Surgical Oncology
Volume: 21
Issue: 10
ISSN: 1068-9265
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2014-10-01
Start Page: 3330
End Page: 3335
Language: English
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3920-2
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC4389284
PUBMED: 25092160
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 2 September 2015 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Monica Morrow
    772 Morrow
  2. Kimberly J Van Zee
    293 Van Zee
  3. Hiram S Cody III
    242 Cody
  4. Alexandra S Heerdt
    110 Heerdt
  5. George Plitas
    107 Plitas
  6. Anne Austin Eaton
    122 Eaton
  7. Michelle Moccio Stempel
    153 Stempel
  8. Cindy Brown Matsen
    7 Matsen
  9. Allison   Hirsch
    4 Hirsch