Provider differences in use of implanted ports in older adults with cancer Journal Article


Authors: Lipitz Snyderman, A.; Elkin, E. B.; Atoria, C. L.; Sima, C. S.; Epstein, A. S.; Blinder, V.; Sepkowitz, K. A.; Bach, P. B.
Article Title: Provider differences in use of implanted ports in older adults with cancer
Abstract: Background: Identifying unwarranted variation in health care can highlight opportunities to reduce harm. One often discretionary process in oncology is use of implanted ports to administer intravenous chemotherapy. While there are benefits, ports carry risks. This study's objective was to assess provider-driven variation in port use among cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Research Design: Retrospective assessment using population-based SEER-Medicare data to assess differences in port use across health care providers of older adults with cancer. Participants included over 18,000 patients ages 66 and older diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung, or pancreatic cancer in 2005-2007, treated by approximately 2900 providers. We identified port use for patients receiving treatment from hospital outpatient facilities versus physicians' offices. Our main analysis assessed the likelihood of a patient receiving a port given port use by the provider's last patient. For a subset of high-use providers, we examined individual provider-level variation by estimating the risk-adjusted likelihood of insertion. Results: Patients receiving chemotherapy in hospital outpatient facilities were significantly less likely to receive a port than those treated in physicians' offices, with adjusted odds ratios (AOR) varying from 0.50 to 0.75 across cancer sites. Implanting a port was associated with increased likelihood of port insertion in the provider's next patient (AOR varied from 1.71 to 2.25). Significant between-provider variation was found among providers with at least 10 patients. Conclusions: Our findings support the idea that there is provider-driven variation in the use of ports for chemotherapy administration. This variation highlights an opportunity to standardize practice and reduce unnecessary use. © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: cancer chemotherapy; aged; major clinical study; cancer patient; pancreas cancer; clinical practice; colorectal cancer; breast cancer; lung cancer; oncology; retrospective study; medicare; malignant neoplastic disease; outpatient; geriatric patient; health care facility; infections; overuse; human; male; female; priority journal; article; implanted port; implantable port system
Journal Title: Medical Care
Volume: 53
Issue: 7
ISSN: 0025-7079
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2015-07-01
Start Page: 646
End Page: 652
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000368
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 26035043
PMCID: PMC4962697
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 3 August 2015 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Camelia S Sima
    212 Sima
  2. Kent A Sepkowitz
    272 Sepkowitz
  3. Elena B Elkin
    163 Elkin
  4. Victoria Susana Blinder
    111 Blinder
  5. Andrew Saul Epstein
    157 Epstein
  6. Peter Bach
    255 Bach
  7. Coral Lynn Atoria
    51 Atoria