Carotid sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy achieves comparable locoregional control to conventional radiotherapy in T1-2N0 laryngeal carcinoma Journal Article


Authors: Zumsteg, Z. S.; Riaz, N.; Jaffery, S.; Hu, M.; Gelblum, D.; Zhou, Y.; Mychalczak, B.; Zelefsky, M. J.; Wolden, S.; Rao, S.; Lee, N. Y.
Article Title: Carotid sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy achieves comparable locoregional control to conventional radiotherapy in T1-2N0 laryngeal carcinoma
Abstract: Background Although intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a standard of care for many head and neck cancers, its use for carotid-sparing (CS) therapy in early-stage laryngeal carcinoma is controversial. Methods 330 consecutive patients with early-stage laryngeal carcinoma were treated from 1/1989 to 5/2011, including 282 conventional radiotherapy (CRT) and 48 CS-IMRT patients. The median follow-up was 43 (CS-IMRT) and 66 (CRT) months. Results There was no difference in local failure rates comparing patients undergoing CS-IMRT with CRT, with 3-year local control rates of 88% vs. 89%, respectively (p = 0.938). Using a 1 cm circumferential margin, the average dose to the left and right carotid arteries was 48.3 and 47.9 Gy, respectively. 88% of locoregional recurrences involved the ipsilateral true vocal cord, including all local recurrences in the IMRT group. Conclusions These results warrant further prospective evaluation of CS-IMRT for early-stage glottic larynx cancer. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: imrt; carotid sparing; early stage laryngeal carcinoma; glottic cancer
Journal Title: Oral Oncology
Volume: 51
Issue: 7
ISSN: 1368-8375
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2015-07-01
Start Page: 716
End Page: 723
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.02.003
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 25958831
PMCID: PMC5508531
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 2 July 2015 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
MSK Authors
  1. Michael J Zelefsky
    750 Zelefsky
  2. Daphna Y Gelblum
    199 Gelblum
  3. Suzanne L Wolden
    538 Wolden
  4. Nadeem Riaz
    378 Riaz
  5. Ying Zhou
    35 Zhou
  6. Nancy Y. Lee
    804 Lee
  7. Shyam S Rao
    83 Rao
  8. Zachary Stephan Zumsteg
    35 Zumsteg
  9. Man Hu
    9 Hu