The association between nerve sparing and a positive surgical margin during radical prostatectomy Journal Article


Authors: Preston, M. A.; Breau, R. H.; Lantz, A. G.; Morash, C.; Gerridzen, R. G.; Doucette, S.; Mallick, R.; Eastham, J. A.; Cagiannos, I.
Article Title: The association between nerve sparing and a positive surgical margin during radical prostatectomy
Abstract: Purpose: A positive surgical margin (SM) during radical prostatectomy (RP) increases risk of biochemical recurrence. We evaluated the effect of nerve-sparing procedures on risk of positive SM for pT2- and pT3-category tumors. We hypothesized that nerve sparing would increase rates of pT2 positive margins. Methods: We evaluated a historical cohort of 9,915 consecutive RP patients treated at The Ottawa Hospital or Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 2000 to 2010. Patients underwent open, laparoscopic, or robotic RP. The primary outcome was presence of a positive SM stratified by pathologic pT2 and pT3 categories. The association between nerve sparing and positive margin was adjusted for prostate-specific antigen, RP Gleason sum, surgical modality, surgical date, and location in the multivariable model. Results: Of 6,120 eligible patients, 3,958 (64.7%) had open RP, 1,566 (25.6%) had laparoscopic RP, and 596 (9.7%) had robotic RP. Approximately 8.6% (363/4,199) of patients with pT2-category disease and 25.2% (485/1,921) of patients with pT3-category disease had a positive margin. Patients with pT2-category disease who underwent a bilateral nerve-sparing procedure were more likely to have a positive margin when compared with those who underwent nerve resection on multivariable analysis (relative risk [RR] = 1.52, 95% CI: 0.97-2.39) after adjusting for confounders. Patients with pT3-category disease who underwent a bilateral nerve-sparing procedure had no associated increase in risk of positive margin after adjustment for other variables (RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.80-1.16). Prostate incision into tumor (pT2R1) was significantly more likely in patients treated with robotic surgery (RR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.25-2.48) than in those with open surgery. There was no difference between laparoscopic and open RP (RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.65-1.12). Conclusions: Bilateral nerve sparing is associated with increased risk of positive SMs in patients with pathologic T2-category disease during RP.
Keywords: adult; human tissue; treatment outcome; middle aged; cancer surgery; surgical technique; major clinical study; cancer recurrence; cancer staging; outcome assessment; prostate specific antigen; cohort analysis; risk factor; risk assessment; prostate cancer; gleason score; prostate; conservative treatment; prostatectomy; carcinoma; surgical anatomy; nerve sparing radical prostatectomy; positive surgical margin; learning curve; nerves; human; male; priority journal; article; robotic surgical procedure; vagotomy
Journal Title: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume: 33
Issue: 1
ISSN: 1078-1439
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2015-01-01
Start Page: 18.e1
End Page: 18.e6
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.09.006
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 25308562
DOI/URL:
Notes: Export Date: 2 March 2015 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. James Eastham
    537 Eastham